Notes of Decisions
New York Pet Welfare Ass'n v. New York City, 850 F.3d 79 (2d Cir. 2017).
· cites it 2× “350 , 352 (codified as amended at 7 U.S.C. § 2145 (b)). Moreover, in 1985, Congress directed that the federal standards applicable to dealers under the AWA “shall not prohibit any State .”
Chris T. Dehart v. Town of Austin, 39 F.3d 718 (7th Cir. 1994).
“” 7 U.S.C. § 2145 (b). In addition, § 2143(a)(8) provides that the statutory authority delegated to the Secretary of Agriculture to “promulgate standards to govern the humane handling, care, treatment, and transportation of animals by dealers, research facilities, and…”
New York Pet Welfare Ass'n v. City of New York, 143 F. Supp. 3d 50 (E.D.N.Y. 2015).
· cites it 2× “”); 7 U.S.C. § 2145 (b) (“The Secretary is authorized to cooperate with- the officials of the various States or political subdivisions thereof in carrying out the purposes of this chapter and of any State, local, or municipal legislation or ordinance on the same subject.”
Commonwealth v. Reynolds, 876 A.2d 1088 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2005).
“See also Section 15(b) of the Animal Welfare Act, 7 U.S.C. § 2145 (b) ("[T]he Secretary is authorized to cooperate with the officials of the various States or political subdivisions thereof in carrying out the purposes of this chapter and of any State, local, or municipal…”
Zimmerman v. Wolff, 622 F. Supp. 2d 240 (E.D. Pa. 2008).
“" 7 U.S.C. § 2145 (b). In addition, § 2143(a)(8) provides that the statutory authority delegated to the Secretary of Agriculture to "promulgate standards to govern the humane handling, care, treatment, and transportation of animals by dealers, research facilities, and…”
Winkler v. Colorado Dept. of Health, 564 P.2d 107 (Colo. 1977).
“) 7 U.S.C. § 2145 (b) (1970). Given the different purposes behind the federal statute (preventing pet thievary and inhumane research) and the Colorado regulations (public health), and the clear expressions of Congressional intent to foster cooperation with state interests under…”
Winkler v. Colorado Dep't of Health, 564 P.2d 107 (Colo. 1977).
“) 7 U.S.C. § 2145 (b) (1970). Given the different purposes behind the federal statute (preventing pet thievery and inhumane research) and the Colorado regulations (public health), and the clear expressions of Congressional intent to foster cooperation with state interests under…”
Hendricks Cnty. Bd. Zoning Appeals v. Barlow, 656 N.E.2d 481 (Ind. Ct. App. 1995).
“For example, the Act declares that "[t]he Secretary is authorized to cooperate with the officials of the various States or political subdivisions thereof in carrying out the purposes of this chapter and of any State, local, or municipal legislation or ordinance on the same…”
Hendricks Cnty. Bd. of Zoning Appeals v. Barlow, 656 N.E.2d 481 (Ind. Ct. App. 1995).
“" 7 U.S.C. § 2145 (b). Moreover, the Act provides that the statutory authority delegated to the See-retary of Agriculture to "promulgate standards to govern the humane handling, care, treatment, and transportation of animals by dealers, research facilities, and exhibitors," see…”
New England Anti-Vivisection Soc'y v. Goldentyer, No. 8:20-cv-02004 (D. Md. Mar. 23, 2023).
· cites it 2× “38-1 at 30; citing 7 U.S.C. § 2145 (a).) While Plaintiffs’ Petition does not expressly state that NIH viewed existing regulations as insufficient, Plaintiffs plainly rely on the new NIH recommendations throughout their Petition as demonstration that a sister agency felt it…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.