§ 75. Powers of Justice or Superior judge after expiration of term or vacation of office
Whenever the term of office of a Justice, Superior judge, Environmental judge, magistrate,
or hearing officer expires or he or she otherwise vacates the office, the Justice,
judge, magistrate, or hearing officer shall have the same authority to conclude causes
he or she has partly or fully heard that he or she would have had if remaining in
that office. The Justice, judge, magistrate, or hearing officer may make and sign
findings and orders for judgments or decrees in causes pending before him or her,
may make interlocutory orders and decrees, and shall be paid compensation commensurate
with that paid specially assigned judicial officers as provided by section 23 of this title. (Amended 1977, No. 235 (Adj. Sess.), § 3; 2009, No. 154 (Adj. Sess.), § 12.)
In Re Fienberg, 430 A.2d 1282 (Vt. 1981). · cites it 2ד§ 22 under which a judge can be recalled for further services, and 4 V.S.A. § 75, under which a judge can conclude causes which he had previously heard in full or in part.”
Wolfe v. Yudichak, 571 A.2d 592 (Vt. 1990). “" The statute is codified, however, in chapter 3 of Title 4, which deals with superior judges and superior court and may have been intended to cover Supreme Court Justices while sitting in superior court.”
Atlas Fin. Corp. v. Oliver, 274 A.2d 687 (Vt. 1971). · cites it 2ד4 V.S.A. §§ 75 and 119 confirm this fundamental principle and make provision for a presiding judge, who has started a case, to continue to its completion, even though his term of office may be expired as in § 75, or after a particular term of court has ended, as in § 119.”
Pizzano Constr. Co. v. Hadwen, 346 A.2d 224 (Vt. 1975). “See 4 V.S.A. §§75 and 119. The judgments of the Bennington Superior Court rendered at the December Term, 1973, and at the June Term, 1974, adjudging the defendants liable to the Pizzano Construction Company, Inc.”
Blair v. Cohen, 163 A.2d 843 (Vt. 1960). “40 of the Acts of 1929. This act constituted an extension of the law relating to powers of county courts and superior judges.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.