Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4004 (2026)

Errors in documentation

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 9 V.S.A. § 4004)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2011–2018 · leading case: Donald L. Sweet, Jr. & Preston L. Sweet v. Roy A. St. Pierre & Catherine St. Pierre d/b/a Woodlands Farms, 201 A.3d 978 (Vt. 2018).
Donald L. Sweet, Jr. & Preston L. Sweet v. Roy A. St. Pierre & Catherine St. Pierre d/b/a Woodlands Farms, 201 A.3d 978 (Vt. 2018). “§ 4002(b) ; (2) by failing to timely dispute the invoices, defendants waived any objection to paying them an hourly wage under 9 V.S.A. § 4004 ; and (3) defendants were not entitled to withhold payment because they failed to establish a good faith counterclaim under 9 V.”
Heindel & Noyes, Inc. v. Tilly (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011). “H&N asserts that Tilly is not entitled to rely upon that good faith dispute because he did not contest the accuracy of the underlying invoices in writing within ten days of receipt as required by 9 V.S.A. § 4004. Tilly contends that he made an oral protest to H&N concerning the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.