Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4197 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 9 V.S.A. § 4197)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2015–2015 · leading case: State of Vermont v. Mphj Tech. Investments, 803 F.3d 635 (Fed. Cir. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of Vermont v. Mphj Tech. Investments, 803 F.3d 635 (Fed. Cir. 2015). · cites it 3× “Its key provision, 9 V.S.A. § 4197, defines the factors that a court can consider in determining if a person made a “bad faith assertion of patent infringement,” including, among others, the contents of the demand letter, the extent of any pre-assertion investigation, demands…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4197(b)(7) — 1 case
State of Vermont v. Mphj Tech. Investments, 803 F.3d 635 (Fed. Cir. 2015). “Its key provision, 9 V.S.A. § 4197, defines the factors that a court can consider in determining if a person made a “bad faith assertion of patent infringement,” including, among others, the contents of the demand letter, the extent of any pre-assertion investigation, demands…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.