Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 09 Chapter 137
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4467 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : RESIDENTIAL RENTAL AGREEMENTS

(Cite as: 9 V.S.A. § 4467)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 56 cases (40 in the last 5 years), 1993–2026 · leading case: State of Vermont Agency of Dev. & Cmty. Affairs v. Bisson, 632 A.2d 34 (Vt. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State of Vermont Agency of Dev. & Cmty. Affairs v. Bisson, 632 A.2d 34 (Vt. 1993). · cites it 5× “9 V.S.A. § 4467(c). 3 If § 6287 applies to renters of mobile homes as well as renters of lots, plaintiffs will prevail.”
Andrus v. Dunbar, 2005 VT 48 (Vt. 2005). · cites it 2× “9 V.S.A. § 4467(a) (allowing termination for nonpayment of rent fourteen days after actual notice to tenant).”
Houle v. Quenneville, 787 A.2d 1258 (Vt. 2001). · cites it 2× “Tenants answered landlords' eviction complaint by denying that they had breached the terms of the rental agreement and raising the affirmative defenses that: (1) pursuant to 9 V.S.A. § 4467(b), notice to terminate tenancy for breach of the rental agreement must be served on the…”
Gabriel Handy v. Kelly Fiske & Kayla Currier, 2023 VT 46 (Vt. 2023). · cites it 2× “Tenants moved to dismiss, arguing that the notice’s inclusion of nonrent charges in the redemption amount was a misstatement of the law under 9 V.S.A. § 4467(a) that rendered the notice deficient.”
In re Beliveau NOV, Town of Fairfax v. Beliveau, 2013 VT 41 (Vt. 2013). “See generally 9 V.S.A. § 4467. ¶ 13. Following homeowner’s suggested approach — that only agreements -with specific or set end dates satisfy the fixed period requirement under the bylaws — would create absurd *7 results.”
Mohamed v. McLaurin, 390 F. Supp. 3d 520 (D. Vt. 2019). “]" 9 V.S.A. § 4467(b)(1) ; see Zurmuhlen v. Uchida , 153 Vt.”
Brattleboro Hous. Auth. v. Parker (In Re Parker), 269 B.R. 522 (D. Vt. 2001). “(citing Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 9, § 4467 (a); Vt. Stat.”
Golden Key, LLC v. Harper, 751 A.2d 798 (Vt. 2000). · cites it 4× “After receiving final approval from the planning commission to build the condominiums, landlord served tenant with a notice to vacate, followed by a summons and complaint for a no cause eviction.”
Vermont Tenants, Inc. v. Vermont Hous. Fin. Agency, 742 A.2d 745 (Vt. 1999). “Plaintiffs argue that the mortgagee becomes a landlord on obtaining title after the property is not redeemed and can terminate a tenancy only pursuant to 9 V.S.A. § 4467. There are both substantive and procedural ramifications to this position.”
Chandler v. Allen (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). · cites it 10× “Indeed, Plaintiffs notice to terminate, dated September 11, 2025, indicates that it was issued pursuant to 9 V.S.A. § 4467, the section within the Residential Rental Agreements Act (““RRAA”) that governs terminations of residential tenancies.”
Welsh Trust v. Jackson (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). · cites it 8× “In Bourne, Judge Tomasi analyzed the two sections of 9 V.S.A. § 4467 that apply to terminations of tenancy when a landlord seeks to end a tenancy for “no cause.”
E & E Props., Inc. v. Tatro (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). · cites it 13× “9 V.S.A. § 4467(a). In this case, neither of plaintiff’s theories for eviction may be cured under the statutes.”
Show all 56 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4467(4) — 1 case
Chandler v. Allen (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “Indeed, Plaintiffs notice to terminate, dated September 11, 2025, indicates that it was issued pursuant to 9 V.S.A. § 4467, the section within the Residential Rental Agreements Act (““RRAA”) that governs terminations of residential tenancies.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4467(a) — 18 cases
Andrus v. Dunbar, 2005 VT 48 (Vt. 2005). “9 V.S.A. § 4467(a) (allowing termination for nonpayment of rent fourteen days after actual notice to tenant).”
Gabriel Handy v. Kelly Fiske & Kayla Currier, 2023 VT 46 (Vt. 2023). “Tenants moved to dismiss, arguing that the notice’s inclusion of nonrent charges in the redemption amount was a misstatement of the law under 9 V.S.A. § 4467(a) that rendered the notice deficient.”
Cahill v. Senecal (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Crestmark v. Tuliper (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Gondal Grp. v. Burke (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4467(b) — 5 cases
Houle v. Quenneville, 787 A.2d 1258 (Vt. 2001). “Tenants answered landlords' eviction complaint by denying that they had breached the terms of the rental agreement and raising the affirmative defenses that: (1) pursuant to 9 V.S.A. § 4467(b), notice to terminate tenancy for breach of the rental agreement must be served on the…”
526 Heineberg Dr v. Jacobs (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
W&W Hous. v. Hale (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
Upper Story Hous. v. Nestor (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
E & E Props., Inc. v. Tatro (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “9 V.S.A. § 4467(a). In this case, neither of plaintiff’s theories for eviction may be cured under the statutes.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4467(b)(1) — 5 cases
Mohamed v. McLaurin, 390 F. Supp. 3d 520 (D. Vt. 2019). “]" 9 V.S.A. § 4467(b)(1) ; see Zurmuhlen v. Uchida , 153 Vt.”
Garcia v. Birch (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
E & E Props., Inc. v. Tatro (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “9 V.S.A. § 4467(a). In this case, neither of plaintiff’s theories for eviction may be cured under the statutes.”
526 Heineberg Dr v. Jacobs (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
Upper Story Hous. v. Nestor (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4467(b)(2) — 3 cases
Garcia v. Birch (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
Morrissey v. Wood (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Gotlieb v. Brown (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4467(c) — 8 cases
State of Vermont Agency of Dev. & Cmty. Affairs v. Bisson, 632 A.2d 34 (Vt. 1993). “9 V.S.A. § 4467(c). 3 If § 6287 applies to renters of mobile homes as well as renters of lots, plaintiffs will prevail.”
Clark v. Richards (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
McDonagh v. Renzello (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
E & E Props., Inc. v. Tatro (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “9 V.S.A. § 4467(a). In this case, neither of plaintiff’s theories for eviction may be cured under the statutes.”
State Agency of Dev. & Com. Aff. v. Bisson, 632 A.2d 34 (Vt. 1993).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4467(c)(1) — 4 cases
State of Vermont Agency of Dev. & Cmty. Affairs v. Bisson, 632 A.2d 34 (Vt. 1993). “9 V.S.A. § 4467(c). 3 If § 6287 applies to renters of mobile homes as well as renters of lots, plaintiffs will prevail.”
Golden Key, LLC v. Harper, 751 A.2d 798 (Vt. 2000). “After receiving final approval from the planning commission to build the condominiums, landlord served tenant with a notice to vacate, followed by a summons and complaint for a no cause eviction.”
State Agency of Dev. & Com. Aff. v. Bisson, 632 A.2d 34 (Vt. 1993).
Nepveu v. Eldred (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4467(c)(1)(A) — 1 case
Campbell v. Limoge (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4467(c)(1)(B) — 3 cases
bedor v. bedor (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
Garcia v. Birch (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
Stacy v. Douglas (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4467(d) — 3 cases
State of Vermont Agency of Dev. & Cmty. Affairs v. Bisson, 632 A.2d 34 (Vt. 1993). “9 V.S.A. § 4467(c). 3 If § 6287 applies to renters of mobile homes as well as renters of lots, plaintiffs will prevail.”
State Agency of Dev. & Com. Aff. v. Bisson, 632 A.2d 34 (Vt. 1993).
526 Heineberg Dr v. Jacobs (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4467(e) — 7 cases
Welsh Trust v. Jackson (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “In Bourne, Judge Tomasi analyzed the two sections of 9 V.S.A. § 4467 that apply to terminations of tenancy when a landlord seeks to end a tenancy for “no cause.”
Clark v. Richards (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
E & E Props., Inc. v. Tatro (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “9 V.S.A. § 4467(a). In this case, neither of plaintiff’s theories for eviction may be cured under the statutes.”
Memphremagog Rentals v. Daniel Kelley (Vt. 2014).
Rogers v. Rogers (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4467(f) — 3 cases
E & E Props., Inc. v. Tatro (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “9 V.S.A. § 4467(a). In this case, neither of plaintiff’s theories for eviction may be cured under the statutes.”
Sisters & Bros. Inv. v. Verchereau (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018).
Sisters & Bros. Inv. v. Verchereau (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4467(g) — 1 case
Golden Key, LLC v. Harper, 751 A.2d 798 (Vt. 2000). “After receiving final approval from the planning commission to build the condominiums, landlord served tenant with a notice to vacate, followed by a summons and complaint for a no cause eviction.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4467(h) — 2 cases
Aldrich v. Riddle (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
heyde v. macias (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4467(i) — 5 cases
Chandler v. Allen (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “Indeed, Plaintiffs notice to terminate, dated September 11, 2025, indicates that it was issued pursuant to 9 V.S.A. § 4467, the section within the Residential Rental Agreements Act (““RRAA”) that governs terminations of residential tenancies.”
Hous. Found. v. Moser (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
215 Summer Street v. Thibodeau (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
Memphremagog Rentals v. Daniel Kelley (Vt. 2014).
E & E Props., Inc. v. Tatro (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “9 V.S.A. § 4467(a). In this case, neither of plaintiff’s theories for eviction may be cured under the statutes.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 4467(k) — 7 cases
Deblasio v. Hathaway (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
Sisters & Bros. Inv. v. Verchereau (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018).
Sisters & Bros. Inv. v. Verchereau (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018).
Garcia v. Birch (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
Smith v. Benware (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.