Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 1269 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : WATER POLLUTION CONTROL

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 1269)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 2005–2017 · leading case: In re Stormwater NPDES Petition, 2006 VT 91 (Vt. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Stormwater NPDES Petition, 2006 VT 91 (Vt. 2006). · cites it 5× “” CLF appealed the Agency’s denial to the Board under 10 V.S.A. § 1269 (“Any person or party...”
Lake Bomoseen Ass'n v. Vermont Water Resources Bd., 2005 VT 79 (Vt. 2005). · cites it 2× “The WRB rule that the dissent relies on is § 9 of the VWR, which is entitled "APPEALS" and provides as follows: Any act or decision of the Secretary under these rules may be appealed within 30 days to the Board pursuant to 10 V.S.A. Section 1269 in accordance with the Board's…”
R.L. Vallee, Inc.et Al MS4 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “10 V.S.A. § 1269. The chapter governing consolidated 3 This TS4 Permit is before the Environmental Division via a Vallee appeal.”
Vt Turquoise Hosp., LLC Discharge Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “See 10 V.S.A. § 1269 (directing that appeals of acts or decisions regarding water pollution control be made in accordance with chapter 220 of Title 10).”
CLF Stormwater Discharge (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008). “It was the legislature, not this [C]ourt, that established the de novo standard applicable to cases in which the ANR is the decisionmaker appealed from; it was equally a de novo standard when such appeals were heard by the Water Resources Board under former 10 V.S.A. § 1269. The…”
Unified Buddhist church, Inc. Indirect Discharge Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007). “When CCCH was decided, the statutory standing requirement (former 10 V.S.A. § 1269) provided that any “person or party aggrieved” by a decision of the ANR could appeal, without a definition of that term.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.