Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 10 Chapter 113
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 4705 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 4705)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1969–2021 · leading case: State v. Duranleau, 260 A.2d 383 (Vt. 1969).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Duranleau, 260 A.2d 383 (Vt. 1969). · cites it 4× “Does the fact that the statute cited make (sic) illegal the mere “carrying or possession” of a loaded gun in a vehicle, render the statute unconstitutional as a violation of a person’s right to bear arms to protect himself and his property as guaranteed by Article 16 of the…”
State v. Max Misch, 2021 VT 10 (Vt. 2021). “In that case, we rejected a defendant’s argument that 10 V.S.A. § 4705(b), which prohibits carrying a loaded rifle or shotgun in a vehicle on a public highway without a permit, violates Article 16.”
State v. Groth, 481 A.2d 26 (Vt. 1984). “Following a trial by jury, defendant was convicted of possessing a loaded rifle while in a motor vehicle on a public highway in violation of 10 V.S.A. § 4705(b). He filed a timely appeal from the judgment entered on a verdict of guilty.”
State v. Max Misch, 2021 VT 10 (Vt. 2021). “In that case, we rejected a defendant’s argument that 10 V.S.A. § 4705(b), which prohibits carrying a loaded rifle or shotgun in a vehicle on a public highway without a permit, violates Article 16.”
State v. Joshua Hayes (Vt. 2015). “He contends: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction of reckless endangerment; and (2) the trial court erroneously denied a motion to continue the trial for the purpose of allowing defendant to procure the attendance of a defense witness. We affirm. The…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 4705(a) — 1 case
State v. Joshua Hayes (Vt. 2015). “He contends: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction of reckless endangerment; and (2) the trial court erroneously denied a motion to continue the trial for the purpose of allowing defendant to procure the attendance of a defense witness. We affirm. The…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 4705(b) — 4 cases
State v. Max Misch, 2021 VT 10 (Vt. 2021). “In that case, we rejected a defendant’s argument that 10 V.S.A. § 4705(b), which prohibits carrying a loaded rifle or shotgun in a vehicle on a public highway without a permit, violates Article 16.”
State v. Duranleau, 260 A.2d 383 (Vt. 1969). “Does the fact that the statute cited make (sic) illegal the mere “carrying or possession” of a loaded gun in a vehicle, render the statute unconstitutional as a violation of a person’s right to bear arms to protect himself and his property as guaranteed by Article 16 of the…”
State v. Groth, 481 A.2d 26 (Vt. 1984). “Following a trial by jury, defendant was convicted of possessing a loaded rifle while in a motor vehicle on a public highway in violation of 10 V.S.A. § 4705(b). He filed a timely appeal from the judgment entered on a verdict of guilty.”
State v. Max Misch, 2021 VT 10 (Vt. 2021). “In that case, we rejected a defendant’s argument that 10 V.S.A. § 4705(b), which prohibits carrying a loaded rifle or shotgun in a vehicle on a public highway without a permit, violates Article 16.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.