Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6602 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 6602)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1994–2025 · leading case: Prive v. Vermont Asbestos Grp., 2010 VT 2 (Vt. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Prive v. Vermont Asbestos Grp., 2010 VT 2 (Vt. 2010). “utive officer for VAG was and has been directly responsible for making all decisions concerning VAG operations including but not limited to maintenance and control of erosion from tailing piles located on VAG’s asbestos mine property, and has personally participated on behalf of…”
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Towns, 790 A.2d 450 (Vt. 2001). · cites it 2× “102, §2, amending 10 V.S.A. §6602(10), (12). Neither change affects the disposition' of this case.”
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Weston, 2003 VT 58 (Vt. 2003). “” Rule 6-201, 8 Code of Vermont Rules 12 036 003-11 (2002); 10 V.S.A § 6602(2) (same definition). According to defendant, he did not violate those rules because the evidence demonstrated that (1) it is common practice for farmers to stack manure for long periods of time; (2) the…”
Sec'y, Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Henry, 641 A.2d 1345 (Vt. 1994). · cites it 2× “§ 8002(7) to include an “authorized representative,” see 10 V.S.A. § 6602(1); 24 V.S.A. § 4752(5), and the ELD reasoned that the more recently enacted permission to delegate in § 2825(d) would have been unnecessary had the Legislature believed it had previously conferred express…”
State v. Goldman Indus. Grp., Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2003). · cites it 8× “” 10 V.S.A. § 6602(10). The statutory definition of “facility” is broad enough to include, conceivably, most any site on which hazardous waste is generated.”
Gerrish Corp. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 949 F. Supp. 236 (D. Vt. 1996). “See also Vt.Stat.Ann. tit. 10, § 6602. Because the State of Vermont’s claim against Gerrish for pollution remediation may arise out of Gerrish’s ownership interest in the site, and Gerrish’s ownership interest in the site is covered by the Policy, Gerrish is an insured party…”
ANR v. Wesco, Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). · cites it 2× “10 V.S.A. § 6602(16); UST Rules § 203:8- 101.”
Hartland v. Coley (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). · cites it 3× “§ 2201, which requires individuals to properly dispose of “solid waste” as defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6602. In its motion, Plaintiff claims that while 10 V.”
state v. bradford oil (Vt. Super. Ct. 2023). “” 10 V.S.A. § 6602(17). That is, “release” refers not to the fact of existing contamination but to the act that causes the contamination.”
Neddo (D. Vt. 2025). “” 10 V.S.A. § 6602(10) (emphasis added). Thus, prior to Act 93, the waste-management liability provision applied only to the owner or operator of a facility where waste was treated, stored, or disposed.”
State of Vermont v. Bradford Oil Co., Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “” 10 V.S.A. § 6602(17). That is, “release” refers not to the fact of existing contamination but to the act that causes the contamination.”
ANR v. Budzyn (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “The Court specifically concluded that the tires stored on Respondents’ Berlin property constituted “solid waste,” as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6602(2) and the Vermont Solid Waste Management Rules.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6602(1) — 1 case
Sec'y, Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Henry, 641 A.2d 1345 (Vt. 1994). “§ 8002(7) to include an “authorized representative,” see 10 V.S.A. § 6602(1); 24 V.S.A. § 4752(5), and the ELD reasoned that the more recently enacted permission to delegate in § 2825(d) would have been unnecessary had the Legislature believed it had previously conferred express…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6602(10) — 3 cases
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Towns, 790 A.2d 450 (Vt. 2001). “102, §2, amending 10 V.S.A. §6602(10), (12). Neither change affects the disposition' of this case.”
Neddo (D. Vt. 2025). “” 10 V.S.A. § 6602(10) (emphasis added). Thus, prior to Act 93, the waste-management liability provision applied only to the owner or operator of a facility where waste was treated, stored, or disposed.”
State v. Goldman Indus. Grp., Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2003). “” 10 V.S.A. § 6602(10). The statutory definition of “facility” is broad enough to include, conceivably, most any site on which hazardous waste is generated.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6602(12) — 1 case
State v. Goldman Indus. Grp., Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2003). “” 10 V.S.A. § 6602(10). The statutory definition of “facility” is broad enough to include, conceivably, most any site on which hazardous waste is generated.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6602(16) — 1 case
ANR v. Wesco, Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “10 V.S.A. § 6602(16); UST Rules § 203:8- 101.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6602(17) — 3 cases
state v. bradford oil (Vt. Super. Ct. 2023). “” 10 V.S.A. § 6602(17). That is, “release” refers not to the fact of existing contamination but to the act that causes the contamination.”
ANR v. Wesco, Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “10 V.S.A. § 6602(16); UST Rules § 203:8- 101.”
State of Vermont v. Bradford Oil Co., Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “” 10 V.S.A. § 6602(17). That is, “release” refers not to the fact of existing contamination but to the act that causes the contamination.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6602(2) — 4 cases
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Weston, 2003 VT 58 (Vt. 2003). “” Rule 6-201, 8 Code of Vermont Rules 12 036 003-11 (2002); 10 V.S.A § 6602(2) (same definition). According to defendant, he did not violate those rules because the evidence demonstrated that (1) it is common practice for farmers to stack manure for long periods of time; (2) the…”
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Towns, 790 A.2d 450 (Vt. 2001). “102, §2, amending 10 V.S.A. §6602(10), (12). Neither change affects the disposition' of this case.”
Hartland v. Coley (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “§ 2201, which requires individuals to properly dispose of “solid waste” as defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6602. In its motion, Plaintiff claims that while 10 V.”
ANR v. Budzyn (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “The Court specifically concluded that the tires stored on Respondents’ Berlin property constituted “solid waste,” as that term is defined in 10 V.S.A. § 6602(2) and the Vermont Solid Waste Management Rules.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6602(3) — 1 case
State v. Goldman Indus. Grp., Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2003). “” 10 V.S.A. § 6602(10). The statutory definition of “facility” is broad enough to include, conceivably, most any site on which hazardous waste is generated.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6602(6) — 1 case
State v. Goldman Indus. Grp., Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2003). “” 10 V.S.A. § 6602(10). The statutory definition of “facility” is broad enough to include, conceivably, most any site on which hazardous waste is generated.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6602(7) — 1 case
State v. Goldman Indus. Grp., Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2003). “” 10 V.S.A. § 6602(10). The statutory definition of “facility” is broad enough to include, conceivably, most any site on which hazardous waste is generated.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6602(8) — 1 case
State v. Goldman Indus. Grp., Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2003). “” 10 V.S.A. § 6602(10). The statutory definition of “facility” is broad enough to include, conceivably, most any site on which hazardous waste is generated.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6602(9) — 1 case
State v. Goldman Indus. Grp., Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2003). “” 10 V.S.A. § 6602(10). The statutory definition of “facility” is broad enough to include, conceivably, most any site on which hazardous waste is generated.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.