Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 24 Chapter 117
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4348 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 003 : REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSIONS

(Cite as: 24 V.S.A. § 4348)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1990–2017 · leading case: In re B&M Realty, LLC, 2016 VT 114 (Vt. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re B&M Realty, LLC, 2016 VT 114 (Vt. 2016). · cites it 2× “See 24 V.S.A. § 4348(h). Finding a lack of evidence in the record on the point, and noting that the applicant bears the burden of showing that the provisions of the plan do not conflict, the court assumed that a conflict existed between the municipal plan and the 2007 Regional…”
In Re Green Peak Estates, 577 A.2d 676 (Vt. 1990). “24 V.S.A. § 4348(h)(1). Where the plans do conflict, the regional plan controls only if it is demonstrated that the project under consideration would have a substantial regional impact.”
Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). · cites it 3× “24 V.S.A. § 4348(h)(1) (“the provisions of the regional plan shall be given effect to the extent that they are not in conflict with the provisions of a duly adopted municipal plan”); In re: Gizmo Realty/VKR Associates, LLC (Appeal of Act 250 Permit #3R0990), No.”
B & M Realty Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). · cites it 4× “Applicant argues that these provisions cannot be the basis of a finding of non-conformity because these provisions do not apply to its Project under 24 V.S.A. § 4348(h) because the Municipal and Regional Plans do not conflict and the Project will not have a substantial regional…”
Gizmo realty-VKR Assocs. LLC Act 250 Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009). · cites it 3× “For the period running from July 30, 2003, through July 3, 2007, the Regional Commission had in effect a regional plan lawfully adopted pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4348. This regional plan is commonly referred to as the 2003 Regional Plan.”
Gizmo Realty/VKR Assoc., LLC Act 250 Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008). · cites it 3× “24 V.S.A. § 4348(h). We are directed to give effect to the provisions of the regional plan “to the extent that they are not in conflict with the provisions of a duly adopted municipal plan.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4348(h) — 3 cases
In re B&M Realty, LLC, 2016 VT 114 (Vt. 2016). “See 24 V.S.A. § 4348(h). Finding a lack of evidence in the record on the point, and noting that the applicant bears the burden of showing that the provisions of the plan do not conflict, the court assumed that a conflict existed between the municipal plan and the 2007 Regional…”
B & M Realty Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). “Applicant argues that these provisions cannot be the basis of a finding of non-conformity because these provisions do not apply to its Project under 24 V.S.A. § 4348(h) because the Municipal and Regional Plans do not conflict and the Project will not have a substantial regional…”
Gizmo Realty/VKR Assoc., LLC Act 250 Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008). “24 V.S.A. § 4348(h). We are directed to give effect to the provisions of the regional plan “to the extent that they are not in conflict with the provisions of a duly adopted municipal plan.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4348(h)(1) — 3 cases
In Re Green Peak Estates, 577 A.2d 676 (Vt. 1990). “24 V.S.A. § 4348(h)(1). Where the plans do conflict, the regional plan controls only if it is demonstrated that the project under consideration would have a substantial regional impact.”
Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “24 V.S.A. § 4348(h)(1) (“the provisions of the regional plan shall be given effect to the extent that they are not in conflict with the provisions of a duly adopted municipal plan”); In re: Gizmo Realty/VKR Associates, LLC (Appeal of Act 250 Permit #3R0990), No.”
Gizmo Realty/VKR Assoc., LLC Act 250 Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008). “24 V.S.A. § 4348(h). We are directed to give effect to the provisions of the regional plan “to the extent that they are not in conflict with the provisions of a duly adopted municipal plan.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4348(h)(2) — 3 cases
B & M Realty Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). “Applicant argues that these provisions cannot be the basis of a finding of non-conformity because these provisions do not apply to its Project under 24 V.S.A. § 4348(h) because the Municipal and Regional Plans do not conflict and the Project will not have a substantial regional…”
Gizmo realty-VKR Assocs. LLC Act 250 Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009). “For the period running from July 30, 2003, through July 3, 2007, the Regional Commission had in effect a regional plan lawfully adopted pursuant to 24 V.S.A. § 4348. This regional plan is commonly referred to as the 2003 Regional Plan.”
Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “24 V.S.A. § 4348(h)(1) (“the provisions of the regional plan shall be given effect to the extent that they are not in conflict with the provisions of a duly adopted municipal plan”); In re: Gizmo Realty/VKR Associates, LLC (Appeal of Act 250 Permit #3R0990), No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.