(a) When the Secretary determines that a violation will or is likely to occur, the Secretary
may issue a written warning that shall be served on the respondent in person or by
certified mail, return receipt requested. The warning shall include a brief description
of the prospective violation; identification of the statute, rule, permit, assurance,
or order that is the subject of the prospective violation; and a brief description
of the potential enforcement actions that may be taken if the violation occurs.
(b) When the Secretary determines that a violation exists, the Secretary may issue a written
notice of the alleged violation. The notice shall be served on the respondent in person
or by certified mail, return receipt requested. The notice shall include a brief description
of the alleged violation; identification of the statute, rule, permit, assurance,
or order that is the subject of the violation; a brief description of the Secretary’s
intended course of action to address the alleged violation; and, if appropriate, specific
timelines and directives to achieve compliance. (Added 1989, No. 98, § 1; amended 2007, No. 191 (Adj. Sess.), § 2.)
Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Bean, 672 A.2d 469 (Vt. 1995). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8006(a) (emphasis added.). Second, the Administrative Order notified defendant of circumstances evincing a violation and ordered him to construct the swales in accordance with the approved plans.”
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Timothy Persons & Trust A of Timothy Persons, 2013 VT 46 (Vt. 2013). · cites it 2דPursuant to 10 V.S.A. §8006, the Secretary of ANR may issue either a written warning or a written notice for an alleged violation, with a brief description of the violation and the intended course of action, as well as specific time lines and directives to achieve compliance, if…”
Vt. Agency of Nat. Resources v. Bean, 672 A.2d 469 (Vt. 1995). “" 10 V.S.A. § 8006(a) (emphasis added.). Second, the Administrative Order notified defendant of circumstances evincing a violation and ordered him to construct the swales in accordance with the approved plans.”
ANR v. Colaceci (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). “Colaceci had five distinct indications that a second AO was imminent: in October 2014, ANR sent him a notice of alleged violation (which it has no obligation to do, see 10 V.S.A. § 8006(a)); in November, ANR sent him a letter stating that it was drawing on his facility-closure…”
ANR v. Colacecci (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). “Colaceci had five distinct indications that a second AO was imminent: in October 2014, ANR sent him a notice of alleged violation (which it has no obligation to do, see 10 V.S.A. § 8006(a)); in November, ANR sent him a letter stating that it was drawing on his facility-closure…”
NRB LUP v. Placzek (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8006 (a), (b). In fact, § 8008(a) formerly provided the same alternative, until it was amended to the present language in 5 Section 8008(a) uses the phrase “in accordance with court rules” only to characterize how a person can be designated to accept service; this…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8006(a) — 4 cases
Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Bean, 672 A.2d 469 (Vt. 1995). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8006(a) (emphasis added.). Second, the Administrative Order notified defendant of circumstances evincing a violation and ordered him to construct the swales in accordance with the approved plans.”
Vt. Agency of Nat. Resources v. Bean, 672 A.2d 469 (Vt. 1995). “" 10 V.S.A. § 8006(a) (emphasis added.). Second, the Administrative Order notified defendant of circumstances evincing a violation and ordered him to construct the swales in accordance with the approved plans.”
ANR v. Colaceci (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). “Colaceci had five distinct indications that a second AO was imminent: in October 2014, ANR sent him a notice of alleged violation (which it has no obligation to do, see 10 V.S.A. § 8006(a)); in November, ANR sent him a letter stating that it was drawing on his facility-closure…”
ANR v. Colacecci (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). “Colaceci had five distinct indications that a second AO was imminent: in October 2014, ANR sent him a notice of alleged violation (which it has no obligation to do, see 10 V.S.A. § 8006(a)); in November, ANR sent him a letter stating that it was drawing on his facility-closure…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8006(b) — 1 case
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Timothy Persons & Trust A of Timothy Persons, 2013 VT 46 (Vt. 2013). “Pursuant to 10 V.S.A. §8006, the Secretary of ANR may issue either a written warning or a written notice for an alleged violation, with a brief description of the violation and the intended course of action, as well as specific time lines and directives to achieve compliance, if…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.