Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8009 (2026)

Emergency administrative orders; request for hearing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 003 : ENFORCEMENT

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 8009)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 2004–2018 · leading case: Nat. Resources Bd. Land Use Panel v. Dorr, MGC, Inc., & Dorr Oil Co., 2015 VT 1 (Vt. 2015).
Nat. Resources Bd. Land Use Panel v. Dorr, MGC, Inc., & Dorr Oil Co., 2015 VT 1 (Vt. 2015). “2 See 10 V.S.A. § 8009(a)(1), (b)(3) (authorizing issuance of an emergency administrative order when an activity or violation “presents an immediate threat of substantial harm to the environment” and the Environmental Division finds “a sufficient showing that grounds for…”
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Francis Supeno, Barbara Supeno, & Barbara Ernst, 185 A.3d 1264 (Vt. 2018). “10 V.S.A. § 8009(a)(1)-(3). ANR's construction of the statute is permissible and it acted within the bounds of the statute by choosing to assess penalties in the AO rather than in the initial EAO.”
ANR v. Supeno, Supeno & Ernst (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). · cites it 2× “§ 1973(a)(6), 10 V.S.A. § 8009(a)(3), and V.R.E.C.P. 4(c).”
NRB v. Dorr (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). · cites it 3× “§ 8009(b) for the 2013 EAO order to issue. Notice of that emergency hearing was provided to Respondents Donald Dorr, Dorr Oil Co.”
ANR v. Wellman (Vt. Super. Ct. 2004). · cites it 2× “76(c), after the presentation of the order to the Court ex parte, upon a finding that the Secretary had made all reasonable efforts to notify Respondent of the presentation of the order to the Court. The Emergency Order was served upon Respondent, who on June 23, 2004, requested…”
NRB v. Dorr (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “While 10 V.S.A. § 8009 is unclear on the issue of administrative penalties, it appears to authorize the NRB to issue administrative orders, and this Court to issue court orders, “on an emergency basis” when injunctive relief is sought on an emergency basis.”
ANR v. Mountain Valley Mktg., Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2006). “132‐7‐99 Vtec, was initially filed as an emergency order under 10 V.S.A. §8009, requiring emergency remedial action but not addressing a penalty.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8009(a)(1) — 2 cases
Nat. Resources Bd. Land Use Panel v. Dorr, MGC, Inc., & Dorr Oil Co., 2015 VT 1 (Vt. 2015). “2 See 10 V.S.A. § 8009(a)(1), (b)(3) (authorizing issuance of an emergency administrative order when an activity or violation “presents an immediate threat of substantial harm to the environment” and the Environmental Division finds “a sufficient showing that grounds for…”
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Francis Supeno, Barbara Supeno, & Barbara Ernst, 185 A.3d 1264 (Vt. 2018). “10 V.S.A. § 8009(a)(1)-(3). ANR's construction of the statute is permissible and it acted within the bounds of the statute by choosing to assess penalties in the AO rather than in the initial EAO.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8009(a)(3) — 2 cases
ANR v. Supeno, Supeno & Ernst (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “§ 1973(a)(6), 10 V.S.A. § 8009(a)(3), and V.R.E.C.P. 4(c).”
ANR v. Wellman (Vt. Super. Ct. 2004). “76(c), after the presentation of the order to the Court ex parte, upon a finding that the Secretary had made all reasonable efforts to notify Respondent of the presentation of the order to the Court. The Emergency Order was served upon Respondent, who on June 23, 2004, requested…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8009(b) — 1 case
NRB v. Dorr (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “§ 8009(b) for the 2013 EAO order to issue. Notice of that emergency hearing was provided to Respondents Donald Dorr, Dorr Oil Co.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8009(d) — 2 cases
ANR v. Supeno, Supeno & Ernst (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “§ 1973(a)(6), 10 V.S.A. § 8009(a)(3), and V.R.E.C.P. 4(c).”
NRB v. Dorr (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013). “§ 8009(b) for the 2013 EAO order to issue. Notice of that emergency hearing was provided to Respondents Donald Dorr, Dorr Oil Co.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8009(f) — 1 case
ANR v. Wellman (Vt. Super. Ct. 2004). “76(c), after the presentation of the order to the Court ex parte, upon a finding that the Secretary had made all reasonable efforts to notify Respondent of the presentation of the order to the Court. The Emergency Order was served upon Respondent, who on June 23, 2004, requested…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.