Vermont Statutes Annotated
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8013 (2026)
Conduct of hearings; appeal; stay
✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Subchapter 003 : ENFORCEMENT
(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 8013)-
§ 8013. Conduct of hearings; appeal; stay
(a) The agency issuing the order shall have the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence.
(b) Parties may be represented by counsel in hearings before the Environmental Division. The Agency of Natural Resources or the Board each may represent itself. A party may conduct cross-examination required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
(c) An appeal from a decision of the Environmental Division may be taken by the Secretary, the Board, or the respondent to the Supreme Court. The Attorney General also may appeal if the Attorney General has appeared as a party.
(d) An appeal by a respondent or the Attorney General to the Supreme Court shall not stay an order, but shall stay payment of a penalty. A respondent may petition the Supreme Court for a stay of an order. (Added 1989, No. 98, § 1; amended 1993, No. 232 (Adj. Sess.), § 38, eff. March 15, 1995; 2009, No. 154 (Adj. Sess.), § 236; 2011, No. 73 (Adj. Sess.), § 3; 2013, No. 11, § 19.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 32
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1992–2026 · leading case: Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Duranleau & Duranleau Constr., Inc., 617 A.2d 143 (Vt. 1992).
Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Duranleau & Duranleau Constr., Inc., 617 A.2d 143 (Vt. 1992). “See 10 V.S.A. § 8013(a),(b); V.R.C.P. 76(d)(2).”
ANR v. Ruby Constr., Inc., No. 6-1-16 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. July 24, 2017). “See 10 V.S.A. § 8013(a) (requiring ANR to prove an alleged violation by preponderance of the evidence).”
ANR v. Foss & Yaratz, No. 68-5-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 9, 2014). “In accordance with 10 V.S.A. § 8013(d), the Court does hereby reconsider and rescind its Entry Order of August 5, 2014 as follows: the injunctive award that directed Respondents Daniel Foss and Angela Yaratz to complete certain remedial measures to cure the stated violations on…”
ANR v. Colaceci, No. 65-5-12 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Dec. 6, 2016). “10 V.S.A. § 8013(d). A party may petition the Supreme Court for a stay under the provisions of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure (V.”
NRB v. Stratton Corp, No. 106-7-14 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 17, 2016). “10 V.S.A. § 8013(d). A party may petition the Supreme Court for a stay under the provisions of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure (V.”
ANR v. South Vill. Owners' Ass'n, No. 33-3-16 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 17, 2016). “10 V.S.A. §8013(d). A party may petition the Supreme Court for a stay under the provisions of V.”
ANR v. Davis, No. 20-2-14 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 2, 2016). “10 V.S.A. § 8013(d). A party may petition the Supreme Court 13 for a stay under the provisions of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure (V.”
ANR v. Myers Container Serv. Corp. - Decision on Merits, No. 21CC00018 (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 25, 2022). “See 10 V.S.A. § 8013(a) (“The agency issuing the order shall have the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence.”
ANR v. Supeno, Supeno & Ernst, No. 98-8-15 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. May 15, 2017). “10 V.S.A. § 8013(d). A party may petition the Supreme Court for a stay under the provisions of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure (V.”
ANR B Wesco, Inc., No. 60-6-16 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Dec. 15, 2017). “10 V.S.A. § 8013(d). A party may petition the Supreme Court for a stay under the provisions of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure (V.”
ANR v. Wesco, Inc., No. 62-6-18 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 23, 2017). “10 V.S.A. § 8013(d). A party may petition the Supreme Court for a stay under the provisions of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure (V.”
ANR v. Wesco, Inc., No. 61-6-16 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 18, 2017). “10 V.S.A. § 8013(d). A party may petition the Supreme Court for a stay under the provisions of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure (V.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8013(a): 7 cases
Vermont Agency of Nat. Resources v. Duranleau & Duranleau Constr., Inc., 617 A.2d 143 (Vt. 1992). “See 10 V.S.A. § 8013(a),(b); V.R.C.P. 76(d)(2).”
ANR v. Myers Container Serv. Corp. - Decision on Merits, No. 21CC00018 (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 25, 2022). “See 10 V.S.A. § 8013(a) (“The agency issuing the order shall have the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence.”
ANR v. Ruby Constr., Inc., No. 6-1-16 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. July 24, 2017). “See 10 V.S.A. § 8013(a) (requiring ANR to prove an alleged violation by preponderance of the evidence).”
Land Use Review Bd. v. 3643 VT Route 103 N, LLC - Decision on Merits, No. 25-ENV-00058 (Vt. Super. Ct. Sept. 30, 2025).
Land Use Review Bd. v. Greene - Merits Decision, No. 26-CC-00002 (Vt. Super. Ct. May 21, 2026).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8013(d): 26 cases
ANR v. Foss & Yaratz, No. 68-5-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 9, 2014). “In accordance with 10 V.S.A. § 8013(d), the Court does hereby reconsider and rescind its Entry Order of August 5, 2014 as follows: the injunctive award that directed Respondents Daniel Foss and Angela Yaratz to complete certain remedial measures to cure the stated violations on…”
ANR v. Colaceci, No. 65-5-12 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Dec. 6, 2016). “10 V.S.A. § 8013(d). A party may petition the Supreme Court for a stay under the provisions of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure (V.”
NRB v. Stratton Corp, No. 106-7-14 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 17, 2016). “10 V.S.A. § 8013(d). A party may petition the Supreme Court for a stay under the provisions of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure (V.”
ANR v. South Vill. Owners' Ass'n, No. 33-3-16 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 17, 2016). “10 V.S.A. §8013(d). A party may petition the Supreme Court for a stay under the provisions of V.”
ANR v. Davis, No. 20-2-14 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 2, 2016). “10 V.S.A. § 8013(d). A party may petition the Supreme Court 13 for a stay under the provisions of the Vermont Rules of Civil Procedure (V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.