Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 11, § 1623 (2026)

Repealed. 2025, No. 10, § 4, eff. July 1, 2025.

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : ASSUMED BUSINESS NAMES, PARTNERSHIPS, AND UNINCORPORATED NONPROFIT ASSOCIATIONS

(Cite as: 11 V.S.A. § 1623)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2024 · leading case: TLOC Senior Living, LLC v. Albert R. (Alpine) Bingham III, 2016 VT 44 (Vt. 2016).
TLOC Senior Living, LLC v. Albert R. (Alpine) Bingham III, 2016 VT 44 (Vt. 2016). · cites it 8× “But the result from the trial court is gridlock — defendant is barred from using the name “The Lodge at Otter Creek” by virtue of plaintiffs common law rights to the trade name, and plaintiff also cannot use the name in commerce without violating the requirements of 11 V.S.A. §…”
rocco realty v. greensboro (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “” 11 V.S.A. § 1623. Since neither of these provisions apply, the Court finds no basis to conclude that Rocco Realty, LLC was obligated to “register” under 11 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 11, § 1623(a) — 1 case
TLOC Senior Living, LLC v. Albert R. (Alpine) Bingham III, 2016 VT 44 (Vt. 2016). “But the result from the trial court is gridlock — defendant is barred from using the name “The Lodge at Otter Creek” by virtue of plaintiffs common law rights to the trade name, and plaintiff also cannot use the name in commerce without violating the requirements of 11 V.S.A. §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.