Such writ may be granted by a Superior judge, or by Superior Court during its sitting,
in the county where such person is imprisoned, on application by complaint in writing
signed by the party for whose relief it is intended or by some person in his or her
behalf, stating the person by whom and the place where the party is imprisoned or
restrained, naming the prisoner and the person detaining him or her, if their names
are known, and describing them, if they are not known, and stating also the cause
or pretense of such imprisonment or restraint, according to the knowledge and belief
of the person applying. The petitioner or the State may appeal from the decision
on the petition to the Supreme Court under chapter 102 of this title. (Amended 1966, No. 41 (Sp. Sess.), § 4, eff. March 12, 1966; 1973, No. 193 (Adj. Sess.), § 3, eff. April 9, 1974.)
In Re Saunders, 415 A.2d 199 (Vt. 1980). “The State appeals from this order, 12 V.S.A. § 3953, the sole issue being whether petitioner’s November 9th arrest under the governor’s warrant vitiated any prior irregularities from his earlier arrest at the Bennington airport.”
In Re M., 321 A.2d 19 (Vt. 1974). “2d 808 (1964), negated any right of appeal in habeas corpus cases; that the 1966 amendment to 12 V.S.A. § 3953 (No. 41 of the Public Acts of 1966) gave such right only to the petitioner or the state: and that, being neither *412 one, appellants can be in court only under V.”
In re Mason, 223 A.2d 477 (Vt. 1966). · cites it 2ד§§7131-35 and relief by way of habeas corpus as authorized under 12 V.S.A. §§3953 and 3957. In both situations, original jurisdiction of such requests in this Court has been removed and the relief available here limited to appellate review of questions raised.”
In re Shuttle, 256 A.2d 28 (Vt. 1969). “41, §4, 12 V.S.A. §3953, the Supreme Court had the power to entertain writs of habeas corpus to test the validity of a person’s confinement after conviction of a criminal offense.”
In Re Lorette, 228 A.2d 790 (Vt. 1967). “Petitioner filed his petition for habeas corpus with a Superior Judge, as provided by 12 V.S.A. §3953. Hearing was held at the Windsor County Courthouse by Superior Judge Robert W.”
Carter v. Menard (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). “12 V.S.A. § 3953. Since the State failed to assert improper venue as a basis for dismissal in its original motion, the Court declines to consider the issue.”
Redcross v. Parole Bd (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “” 12 V.S.A. § 3953. The record shows that Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.