Actions on judgments and actions for the renewal or revival of judgments shall be
brought by filing a new and independent action on the judgment within eight years
after the rendition of the judgment, and not after. (Amended 1971, No. 185 (Adj. Sess.), § 33, eff. March 29, 1972; 2009, No. 132 (Adj. Sess.), § 8, eff. May 29, 2010.)
H&E Equip. Servs., Inc. v. Cassani Elec., Inc. & Nicholas Cassani, 169 A.3d 1308 (Vt. 2017). · cites it 13דDefendant argues that the action is time-barred under 12 V.S.A. § 506. Alternatively, he contends that there is a material dispute of fact as to whether the Arizona court had personal jurisdiction over him at the time it entered its judgment.”
Ayer v. Hemingway, Hemingway Constr. & Harris, 2013 VT 37 (Vt. 2013). · cites it 12דAs the court explained, revival required the filing of a new and independent action on the judgment, see 12 V.S.A. § 506, which had not occurred here.”
Angela Blake v. Damon Petrie, 2020 VT 92 (Vt. 2020). · cites it 22דIn denying the motion, the family division found Blake had complied with the family division rules for enforcement proceedings and with 12 V.S.A. § 506. It then granted Petrie’s motion for interlocutory appeal to this Court.”
Nelson v. Russo, 2008 VT 66 (Vt. 2008). · cites it 10דHe asserts that the superior court erred when it upheld a ruling that allowed plaintiff Carroll Nelson to renew his aging judgment by motion instead of requiring a separate action on the judgment in accordance with 12 V.S.A. § 506. We reverse and remand. ¶ 2.”
Flex-A-Seal, Inc. v. Safford, 2015 VT 40 (Vt. 2015). · cites it 7דThe trial court found the complaint barred by the statute of limitations, 12 V.S.A. § 506. On appeal, Flex-A-Seal argues that: (1) the controlling judgment for statute-of-limitations purposes was issued in 2004, not 2002; (2) the statute of limitations was tolled by the terms of…”
Marine Midland Bank v. Bicknell, 2004 VT 25 (Vt. 2004). · cites it 4דBicknell moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim, arguing that the action was barred by 12 V.S.A. § 506, the eight year statute of limitations for actions on judgments.”
Koerber v. Middlesex Coll., 383 A.2d 1054 (Vt. 1978). · cites it 4דFinding that the action was not barred by the eight year statute of limitation applicable to actions on judgments, 12 V.S.A. § 506, the lower court entered judgment in Koerber’s favor, granting him the full relief sought.”
Douglas S. Johnston v. Lorrie Johnston, 212 A.3d 627 (Vt. 2019). · cites it 2דSee 12 V.S.A. § 506 ("Actions on judgments and actions for the renewal or revival of judgments shall be brought by filing a new and independent action on the judgment within eight years after the rendition of the judgment, and not after.”
Scott Traudt v. Victoria Traudt, 2022 VT 58 (Vt. 2022). · cites it 5דPlaintiff argues that defendant is barred from enforcing the judgment by the eight-year statute of limitations for actions on judgments set forth in 12 V.S.A. § 506. The family division found that the statute of limitations did not apply because plaintiff had acknowledged the…”
Kayenta Twp. v. Churchill (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). · cites it 2דSuch judgments must instead be “domesticated,” that is, they must be recognized and made a Vermont judgment by a Vermont court, in “a new and independent action” brought pursuant to 12 V.S.A. § 506. See US Acquisition, 2021 WL 8201983 , at *2; 12 V.”
City of Burlington v. Richardson (Vt. Super. Ct. 2006). · cites it 3ד§4454(a) (former §4496(a)); that enforcement of the 1984 Court Order is time‐barred by expiration of the judgment order under 12 V.S.A. §506; that an action under 24 V.”
Larose v. Desmarais (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “First is whether Plaintiff is entitled to recovery its attorney fees in this second judgment renewal action.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.