Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 513 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : ACTIONS LIMITED

(Cite as: 12 V.S.A. § 513)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1972–2025 · leading case: Beecher v. Stratton Corp., 743 A.2d 1093 (Vt. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Beecher v. Stratton Corp., 743 A.2d 1093 (Vt. 1999). · cites it 4× “See 12 V.S.A. § 513 (action to recover for injuries sustained *1095 while participating in sport of skiing shall be commenced within one year after cause of action accrues).”
Sunday v. Stratton Corp., 390 A.2d 398 (Vt. 1978). “12 V.S.A. § 513. In cases like this one, any accurate determination of prospective damage during that short period may well be impossible.”
Wanner v. Glen Ellen Corp., 373 F. Supp. 983 (D. Vt. 1974). · cites it 4× “Defendant has moved to dismiss this action, contending that Vermont’s one year statute of limitations for injuries received while participating in the sport of skiing bars the maintenance of these claims.”
Weiner v. Sherburne Corp., 348 F. Supp. 797 (D. Vt. 1972). · cites it 5× “, which answered within the time allowed alleging, inter alia,, that the action is barred by the statute of limitations in as much as it was not commenced within one year after the cause of action accrued as required by the provisions of 12 V.”
Weiner v. Sherburne Corp., 57 F.R.D. 636 (D. Vt. 1972). · cites it 3× “” 12 V.S.A. § 513 (1958). Approximately one year and four months had passed from the time plaintiffs’ cause of action accrued on January 17, 1971, to the filing of plaintiffs’ amended complaint against Phase IV, Inc.”
Riley v. Brook (2d Cir. 2016). “24, 2015) (citing Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 513 (2016)). CONCLUSION We have considered all of Riley’s arguments on appeal and found them to be without merit.”
Riley v. Brook, 667 F. App'x 12 (2d Cir. 2016). “24, 2015) (citing Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 513 (2016)). CONCLUSION We have considered all of Riley’s arguments on appeal and found them to be without merit.”
polak v. ramirez-diaz (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “” 12 V.S.A. § 513 1(6). It is easy to conclude that a physical assault perpetrated’by a neighbor would cause a reasonable person to fear for their safety, especially if said assault occurred in the midst of an ongoing dispute with said neighbor.”
Dakoulas v. Kruk (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “” 12 V.S.A. § 513. The statute is an industry-specific “curtailment” of the general statute of limitations, which otherwise permits personal-injury actions to brought within three years after the cause of action accrues.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.