Vermont Statutes Annotated
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 5673 (2026)
Applications to court; service
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Subchapter 003 : JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS
(Cite as: 12 V.S.A. § 5673)-
§ 5673. Applications to court; service
(a) Except as otherwise provided, an application to the Superior Court under this chapter shall be by motion and shall be heard in the manner and upon the notice provided by law or rule for the making and hearing of motions.
(b) Unless the parties have agreed otherwise, notice of an initial application for an order shall be served in the manner provided by law for the service of a summons in a civil action. (Added 1985, No. 95, § 2.)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1997–2019 · leading case: Northfield Sch. Bd. v. Washington South Educ. Ass'n & Paul Clayton, 210 A.3d 460 (Vt. 2019).
Northfield Sch. Bd. v. Washington South Educ. Ass'n & Paul Clayton, 210 A.3d 460 (Vt. 2019). “In response, the Board filed a complaint and motion to enjoin arbitration with the trial court, requesting that the court enter an order: (1) staying and dismissing the pending arbitration, pursuant to the Vermont Arbitration Act, 12 V.S.A. §§ 5673 and 5674(b) ; and (2)…”
Springfield Teachers Ass'n v. Springfield Sch. Directors, 705 A.2d 541 (Vt. 1997). “” 12 V.S.A. § 5673(a). By specifying this route for court review, the Legislature clearly intended that judicial intervention would be based on summary procedures.”
Northfield Sch. Bd. v. Washington South Educ. Ass'n (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018). “The School Board seeks declaratory judgment pursuant to 12 V.S.A. §§ 5673–5674 and an injunction enjoining arbitration proceedings.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 12, § 5673(a) — 1 case
Springfield Teachers Ass'n v. Springfield Sch. Directors, 705 A.2d 541 (Vt. 1997). “” 12 V.S.A. § 5673(a). By specifying this route for court review, the Legislature clearly intended that judicial intervention would be based on summary procedures.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.