A person who maliciously threatens to accuse another of a crime or offense, or with
an injury to his or her person or property, with intent to extort money or other pecuniary
advantage, or with intent to compel the person so threatened to do an act against
his or her will, shall be imprisoned not more than three years or fined not more than
$500.00, or both. (Amended 1971, No. 199 (Adj. Sess.), § 15; 1973, No. 109, § 6; 1981, No. 223 (Adj. Sess.), § 23.)
Shahi v. Madden, 2008 VT 25 (Vt. 2008). “§§ 1062-1063, and (9) extortion in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 1701. 1 During a status conference on January 9, 2006, the court declined to rule on the motion to amend until such time as defendant’s spouse could be deposed.”
State v. Harrington, 260 A.2d 692 (Vt. 1969). · cites it 2דThe indictment charges that the threat was maliciously made with the intent to extort $175,000 and to compel Morin to do an act against his will in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 1701. At the outset the respondent acknowledges that there is no serious conflict in the material evidence…”
State v. Ashley, 632 A.2d 1368 (Vt. 1993). “Such conduct is generally proscribed under 13 V.S.A. § 1701 (extortion and threats) as well as the obstruction-of-justice statute, 13 V.”
State v. Doyen, 676 A.2d 345 (Vt. 1996). “2d 692, 697 (1969), this Court interpreted § 2 in the context of a prosecution for blackmail (13 V.S.A. § 1701). The defendant, a Vermont lawyer, had mailed a threatening letter in Vermont to a recipient in New Hampshire.”
State v. Carroll, 513 A.2d 1159 (Vt. 1986). “13 V.S.A. § 1701. The judgment is reversed and the matter remanded for a new trial.”
State v. van Aelstyn, 2007 VT 6 (Vt. 2007). “Defendant, a licensed Vermont attorney who moved to California, had difficulty retaining counsel to represent him after his arraignment in February 2004 on two counts of extortion, 13 V.S.A. § 1701, and one count of stalking, 13 V.”
State v. Hackett, 446 A.2d 369 (Vt. 1982). “13 V.S.A. § 1701. The basis for this charge was an alleged telephone call from the defendant at Champlain, New York, to a former schoolmate at St.”
State v. van Aelstyn, 181 Vt. 274 (Vt. 2007). “Defendant, a licensed Vermont attorney who moved to California, had difficulty retaining counsel to represent him after his arraignment in February 2004 on two counts of extortion, 13 V.S.A. § 1701, and one count of stalking, 13 V.”
State v. Galusha, 665 A.2d 595 (1995). · cites it 2דIt argues that “injury to the person” in 13 V.S.A. § 1701 includes injury other than physical harm and that the trial court should not have dismissed the charge for lack of a prima facie case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.