A person who designedly by false pretenses or by privy or false token and with intent
to defraud, obtains from another person money or other property, or a release or discharge
of a debt or obligation, or the signature of a person to a written instrument, the
false making whereof would be punishable as forgery, shall be imprisoned not more
than 10 years or fined not more than $2,000.00, or both, if the money or property
so obtained exceeds $900.00 in value. A person who violates this section shall be
imprisoned for not more than one year or fined not more than $1,000.00, or both, if
the money or property obtained in violation of this section is valued at $900.00 or
less. (Amended 1971, No. 199 (Adj. Sess.), § 15; 1981, No. 223 (Adj. Sess.), § 23; 2005, No. 156 (Adj. Sess.), § 2.)
State v. Bissonette, 488 A.2d 1231 (Vt. 1985). · cites it 3דDefendant appeals his conviction, under 13 V.S.A. § 2002, of obtaining money or other property by false pretenses.”
Pickett v. Quinn (In Re Pickett), 321 B.R. 663 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2005). · cites it 2דThe only dispute with regard to the filing of the First Information is whether the Defendant can prove the requisite elements under 13 V.S.A. § 2002, the Vermont “bad check” statute.”
State v. Foley, 443 A.2d 452 (Vt. 1982). · cites it 2ד5(b): “Did the Vermont Legislature repeal by implication the false token statute, 13 V.S.A. § 2002, when it enacted the bad check statute, 13 V.”
State v. Bergerson, 475 A.2d 1071 (Vt. 1984). · cites it 2דFollowing a plea of guilty to false pretenses, a violation of 13 V.S.A. § 2002, defendant was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 6 to 18 months, all suspended but 30 days.”
State v. Allen, 507 A.2d 975 (Vt. 1986). · cites it 6דThis appeal requires us to determine whether the presentment for payment of a third party’s check by a person who knows payment on that check has been stopped, but makes no express written or oral representation with respect thereto, constitutes the crime of obtaining money by…”
State v. Rounds, 2011 VT 39 (Vt. 2011). “§ 2029; Count Two, misdemeanor false pretenses, under 13 V.S.A. §2002, based on the double payment for the $600 French doors; and Count Three, felony false pretenses, under the same statute, for cashing the two $7500 checks.”
State v. North, 2009 VT 40 (Vt. 2009). · cites it 2דOn June 5, 2007, the Chittenden District Court imposed an effective sentence of three to twenty years for obtaining property by false pretenses or tokens in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 2002 and passing bad checks in violation of 13 V.”
In Re Dobson, 212 A.2d 620 (Vt. 1965). “§2004, that charges under the false token statute, 13 V.S.A. §2002, are not subject to the general provision of 4 V.”
State v. Quesnel, 207 A.2d 155 (Vt. 1965). · cites it 2דThe respondent is informed against for fraud under 13 V.S.A. §2002 resulting on trial in a verdict of guilty and appeal by respondent.”
State v. Sears, 296 A.2d 218 (Vt. 1972). “The respondent was charged and convicted as a principal in the felony of obtaining money by false token, under the provisions of 13 V.S.A. § 2002. A bill of particulars was sought by the respondent when charged, and duly furnished.”
State v. Rickert, 205 A.2d 547 (Vt. 1964). “The respondent was convicted by a jury on three felony counts of obtaining property by false token in violation of 13 V.S.A. §2002 during the September Term of Chittenden County Court, 1963.”
Lyndonville Sav. Bank & T. Co. v. Peerless Ins. Co., 234 A.2d 340 (Vt. 1967). “Under 13 V.S.A. §2002: “A person who designedly by false pretenses or false token and with intent to defraud, obtains from another person money or other property, or a release or discharge of a debt or obligation, or the signature of a person to a written instrument, the false…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.