Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 13 Chapter 47
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2029 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 2029)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2011–2016 · leading case: State v. Rounds, 2011 VT 39 (Vt. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Rounds, 2011 VT 39 (Vt. 2011). · cites it 8× “t he knowingly promised performance that he did not intend to complete, in whole or in part, at the time he' entered into the contract, and the court’s ruling to the contrary ignores his substantial performance under the contract; (2) the trial court gave a faulty permissive…”
State v. Robert Witham, 2015 VT 51 (Vt. 2016). · cites it 5× “On October 12, 2005, defendant pled guilty to one count of home improvement fraud in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 2029(b)(1). The plea agreement imposed a four to twelve month sentence, all suspended but for ten days on the work crew, and required defendant to perform restitution,…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2029(a) — 1 case
State v. Rounds, 2011 VT 39 (Vt. 2011). “t he knowingly promised performance that he did not intend to complete, in whole or in part, at the time he' entered into the contract, and the court’s ruling to the contrary ignores his substantial performance under the contract; (2) the trial court gave a faulty permissive…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2029(b)(1) — 2 cases
State v. Rounds, 2011 VT 39 (Vt. 2011). “t he knowingly promised performance that he did not intend to complete, in whole or in part, at the time he' entered into the contract, and the court’s ruling to the contrary ignores his substantial performance under the contract; (2) the trial court gave a faulty permissive…”
State v. Robert Witham, 2015 VT 51 (Vt. 2016). “On October 12, 2005, defendant pled guilty to one count of home improvement fraud in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 2029(b)(1). The plea agreement imposed a four to twelve month sentence, all suspended but for ten days on the work crew, and required defendant to perform restitution,…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2029(c) — 1 case
State v. Rounds, 2011 VT 39 (Vt. 2011). “t he knowingly promised performance that he did not intend to complete, in whole or in part, at the time he' entered into the contract, and the court’s ruling to the contrary ignores his substantial performance under the contract; (2) the trial court gave a faulty permissive…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2029(d)(1) — 1 case
State v. Robert Witham, 2015 VT 51 (Vt. 2016). “On October 12, 2005, defendant pled guilty to one count of home improvement fraud in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 2029(b)(1). The plea agreement imposed a four to twelve month sentence, all suspended but for ten days on the work crew, and required defendant to perform restitution,…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 2029(f)(2) — 1 case
State v. Robert Witham, 2015 VT 51 (Vt. 2016). “On October 12, 2005, defendant pled guilty to one count of home improvement fraud in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 2029(b)(1). The plea agreement imposed a four to twelve month sentence, all suspended but for ten days on the work crew, and required defendant to perform restitution,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.