A person who, being lawfully required to depose the truth in a proceeding in a court
of justice or in a contested case before a State agency pursuant to 3 V.S.A. chapter
25, commits perjury shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years or fined not more than
$10,000.00, or both. (Amended 1971, No. 199 (Adj. Sess.), § 15; 1981, No. 223 (Adj. Sess.), § 23; 1983, No. 244 (Adj. Sess.), § 1; 2005, No. 148 (Adj. Sess.), § 4a; 2019, No. 77, § 13, eff. June 19, 2019.)
State v. Saari, 568 A.2d 344 (Vt. 1989). “§ 502; perjury, 13 V.S.A. § 2901; and assault and robbery, 13 V.”
Olio v. Olio, 2012 VT 44 (Vt. 2012). “In some cases, a litigant’s conduct may constitute the type of egregious fraud against the court that triggers the exception recognized in Godin.”
In Re Kroger, 702 A.2d 64 (Vt. 1997). “” 13 VS.A. §§ 2901, 2904 (establishing criminal penalties for perjury and false swearing).”
State v. Polidor, 285 A.2d 770 (Vt. 1971). “13 V.S.A. §§ 2901, 2902, 2903, 2904. It is argued by the State that the admitted plea of guilty by Atkinson in the federal court to the charge of conspiracy to commit perjury does not bring him under the prohibition of 13 V.”
State v. Franklin, 883 A.2d 783 (Vt. 2005). “Defendant, Lynda Franklin, was convicted of perjury pursuant to 13 V.S.A. § 2901 based on her testimony given during a prior prosecution for driving while intoxicated (DWI), that she had not operated a vehicle while she was intoxicated.”
State v. Lawrence, 360 A.2d 55 (Vt. 1976). · cites it 2דDefendant now appeals from the resulting conviction and judgment of guilty on each count. Defendant claims that the State’s evidence tended to prove a violation of the crime of common law perjury, a violation of 13 V.”
State v. LaCourse, 716 A.2d 14 (Vt. 1998). · cites it 2דDefendant appeals his jury conviction of perjury in violation of 13 V.S.A. § 2901. He contends that: (1) the trial court erroneously failed to submit the issue of materiality to the jury; and (2) the prosecutor improperly adduced testimony concerning defendant’s pre-arrest…”
State v. Ashley Nutbrown-Covey (Vt. 2016). “Specifically, she was accused of submitting false affidavits: in Count 1, alleging that her estranged husband sent her a threatening email; and in Count II, alleging that certain letters, attached to a later affidavit, were authentic.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.