(a) The test when used as a defense in criminal cases shall be as follows:
(1) A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as
a result of mental disease or defect the person lacks adequate capacity either to
appreciate the criminality of the person’s conduct or to conform the person’s conduct
to the requirements of law.
(2) The terms “mental disease or defect” do not include an abnormality manifested only
by repeated criminal or otherwise antisocial conduct. The terms “mental disease or
defect” includes congenital and traumatic mental conditions as well as disease.
(b) The defendant shall have the burden of proof in establishing insanity as an affirmative
defense by a preponderance of the evidence. The defendant shall be responsible for
hiring the defendant’s own forensic evaluator for the purpose of establishing insanity,
provided that the Office of the Defender General shall pay for the evaluation of an
indigent defendant. (Amended 1983, No. 75; 2023, No. 28, § 1, eff. July 1, 2023.)
State v. Sexton, 2006 VT 55 (Vt. 2006). · cites it 26דand the effects of voluntary consumption of illegal drugs apply to a charge of second degree murder based upon wanton disregard of the likelihood that one's conduct would naturally cause death or great bodily harm, so as to reduce the offense to voluntary manslaughter? *1097 (3)…”
State v. Messier, 497 A.2d 740 (Vt. 1985). · cites it 3דThis is an interlocutory appeal from a decision of the Orleans District Court, holding Vermont’s insanity defense statute, 13 V.S.A. § 4801 (b), unconstitutional. Clifford Messier, the defendant, stands charged with murder in the first degree.”
State v. Smith, 396 A.2d 126 (Vt. 1978). · cites it 3דThe test of responsibility for criminal conduct is set out in 13 V.S.A. § 4801: The test when used as a defense in criminal cases shall be as follows: (1) A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he…”
State v. Willis, 494 A.2d 108 (Vt. 1985). · cites it 2דThus, defendant advanced an insanity defense under the former 13 V.S.A. § 4801, now 13 V.S.A. § 4801(a).”
State v. Howe, 386 A.2d 1125 (Vt. 1978). · cites it 2ד" 13 V.S.A. § 4801. Taking the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, State v.”
State v. Bishop, 260 A.2d 393 (Vt. 1969). · cites it 4דThe test of insanity as a defense in criminal cases in this State appears in 13 V.S.A. § 4801 and is as follows: (1) A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks adequate capacity either to…”
State v. Smith, 437 A.2d 1093 (Vt. 1981). · cites it 4ד§ 4801: (1) A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks adequate capacity either to appreciate the criminality of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of law.”
State v. Percy, 548 A.2d 408 (Vt. 1988). · cites it 2דSee 13 V.S.A. § 4801(a)(1). In reaching a conclusion on this question, our law requires the fact-finder to exclude “abnormality manifested only by repeated criminal or otherwise anti-social conduct.”
State v. Bean, 762 A.2d 1259 (Vt. 2000). · cites it 2ד13 V.S.A. § 4801(b). A defendant raising an insanity defense must give notice thereof on the date of the status conference, or ten days prior to trial, whichever is sooner.”
State v. Valley, 571 A.2d 579 (Vt. 1989). · cites it 2ד" See 13 V.S.A. § 4801(a)(2). There is an additional concern about the evidence here, not present in Catsam and cases similar to it: whether the statistical evidence can be perceived as expert testimony about the probability that the defendant was guilty, or in this case not…”
State v. Matthew Webster, 179 A.3d 149 (Vt. 2017). “13 V.S.A. § 4801(b). When the Legislature shifted the burden to the defendant to establish insanity, it evidenced an intent that sanity not be an essential element of the crime.”
State v. Davignon, 565 A.2d 1301 (Vt. 1989). · cites it 2דIn that case we upheld the validity of 13 V.S.A. § 4801(b) which, by a 1983 amendment, shifted the burden of proof on insanity to the defendant, to be established by a preponderance of the evidence.”
State v. Willis, 494 A.2d 108 (Vt. 1985). “Thus, defendant advanced an insanity defense under the former 13 V.S.A. § 4801, now 13 V.S.A. § 4801(a).”
State v. Messier, 497 A.2d 740 (Vt. 1985). “This is an interlocutory appeal from a decision of the Orleans District Court, holding Vermont’s insanity defense statute, 13 V.S.A. § 4801 (b), unconstitutional. Clifford Messier, the defendant, stands charged with murder in the first degree.”
State v. Sexton, 2006 VT 55 (Vt. 2006). “and the effects of voluntary consumption of illegal drugs apply to a charge of second degree murder based upon wanton disregard of the likelihood that one's conduct would naturally cause death or great bodily harm, so as to reduce the offense to voluntary manslaughter? *1097 (3)…”
State v. Percy, 548 A.2d 408 (Vt. 1988). “See 13 V.S.A. § 4801(a)(1). In reaching a conclusion on this question, our law requires the fact-finder to exclude “abnormality manifested only by repeated criminal or otherwise anti-social conduct.”
State v. Sexton, 2006 VT 55 (Vt. 2006). “and the effects of voluntary consumption of illegal drugs apply to a charge of second degree murder based upon wanton disregard of the likelihood that one's conduct would naturally cause death or great bodily harm, so as to reduce the offense to voluntary manslaughter? *1097 (3)…”
State v. Valley, 571 A.2d 579 (Vt. 1989). “" See 13 V.S.A. § 4801(a)(2). There is an additional concern about the evidence here, not present in Catsam and cases similar to it: whether the statistical evidence can be perceived as expert testimony about the probability that the defendant was guilty, or in this case not…”
State v. Percy, 548 A.2d 408 (Vt. 1988). “See 13 V.S.A. § 4801(a)(1). In reaching a conclusion on this question, our law requires the fact-finder to exclude “abnormality manifested only by repeated criminal or otherwise anti-social conduct.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 4801(b) — 8 cases
State v. Sexton, 2006 VT 55 (Vt. 2006). “and the effects of voluntary consumption of illegal drugs apply to a charge of second degree murder based upon wanton disregard of the likelihood that one's conduct would naturally cause death or great bodily harm, so as to reduce the offense to voluntary manslaughter? *1097 (3)…”
State v. Bean, 762 A.2d 1259 (Vt. 2000). “13 V.S.A. § 4801(b). A defendant raising an insanity defense must give notice thereof on the date of the status conference, or ten days prior to trial, whichever is sooner.”
State v. Matthew Webster, 179 A.3d 149 (Vt. 2017). “13 V.S.A. § 4801(b). When the Legislature shifted the burden to the defendant to establish insanity, it evidenced an intent that sanity not be an essential element of the crime.”
State v. Davignon, 565 A.2d 1301 (Vt. 1989). “In that case we upheld the validity of 13 V.S.A. § 4801(b) which, by a 1983 amendment, shifted the burden of proof on insanity to the defendant, to be established by a preponderance of the evidence.”
State v. Messier, 497 A.2d 740 (Vt. 1985). “This is an interlocutory appeal from a decision of the Orleans District Court, holding Vermont’s insanity defense statute, 13 V.S.A. § 4801 (b), unconstitutional. Clifford Messier, the defendant, stands charged with murder in the first degree.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.