Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 4950 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : UNIFORM CRIMINAL EXTRADITION ACT

(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 4950)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1977–1996 · leading case: Lovejoy v. State, 531 A.2d 921 (Vt. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lovejoy v. State, 531 A.2d 921 (Vt. 1987). “§ 4950, which provides that a person arrested under a Governor’s warrant shall have an opportunity to challenge the legality of the arrest by way of habeas corpus, strongly supports our conclusion that a petition for writ of habeas corpus is the appropriate manner to challenge…”
In Re Iverson, 376 A.2d 23 (Vt. 1977). “13 V.S.A. § 4950. The petition was denied by the Addison Superior Court, and a notice of appeal was filed with this Court.”
In Re Roessel, 388 A.2d 835 (Vt. 1978). “13 V.S.A. § 4950; 12 V.S.A., ch. 143. The appellant made four claims in his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.”
In re Lovejoy, 556 A.2d 79 (Vt. 1988). “13 V.S.A. § 4950. Nor do we find that the proof of identification was deficient in this case.”
In re Haynes, 583 A.2d 88 (Vt. 1990). “At the 13 V.S.A. § 4950 hearing held on December 19, 1989, petitioner indicated that he intended to challenge the governor’s warrant.”
In re Nason, 682 A.2d 955 (Vt. 1996). “See 13 VS.A. § 4950 (“legality of the arrest” must be tested by application for writ of habeas corpus).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.