Counsel shall be assigned under section 5231 of this title to represent needy persons in any of the following:
(1) extradition proceedings;
(2) habeas corpus and other proceedings wherein the person is confined in a penal or mental
institution in this state and seeks release therefrom; or
(3) proceedings arising out of a petition brought in a juvenile court when the court deems
the interests of justice require representation of either the child or his or her
parents or guardian or both, including any subsequent proceedings arising from an
order therein. (Added 1971, No. 161 (Adj. Sess.), § 6, eff. date, see note.)
In re R.W. & N.W., 2011 VT 124 (Vt. 2011). · cites it 2ד” 13 V.S.A. § 5232(3); see Lassiter v. Dep’t of Social Servs.”
Mullin v. Phelps, 647 A.2d 714 (Vt. 1994). · cites it 2דSee 13 V.S.A. § 5232(3) (court shall assign counsel to needy persons, including parents, in juvenile proceedings when interest of justice requires it).”
In re G.F., 923 A.2d 578 (Vt. 2007). “” 13 V.S.A. § 5232(3). There was no way on this record that the family court could make an informed decision that the interests of justice required counsel.”
In re C.B., Juv., 2020 VT 80 (Vt. 2020). “Father also contends that he was improperly denied standing at the merits stage of the CHINS proceeding and was erroneously not granted counsel until after the initial disposition order issued. There is no merit to father’s argument that the court failed to properly assign him…”
In re L.H., L.H. & L.H., Juveniles, 182 A.3d 612 (Vt. 2018). “§ 5112(a) ("The Court shall appoint an attorney for a child who is a party to a proceeding brought under the juvenile judicial proceedings chapters.”
Conway v. Cumming, 636 A.2d 735 (Vt. 1993). “Moreover, in Fletcher , the inmate was involved in a habeas proceeding for which counsel is expressly provided in 13 V.S.A. § 5232(2). No equivalent statutory right exists for representation in disciplinary proceedings.”
In re S.C., 88 A.3d 1220 (Vt. 2014). “” 13 V.S.A. § 5232(3). By administrative order, this Court has also ensured continued representation of *419 aggrieved parents on appeal, by providing that an appeal from a termination judgment is “not considered a separate proceeding and thus does not require a separate…”
In Re Morse, 415 A.2d 232 (Vt. 1980). “” 13 V.S.A. §§ 5232(2), 5233(a) (3). The defendant claims that he is a needy person confined in a penal institute, and that he considers this post-conviction proceeding appropriate.”
In Re Chapman, 581 A.2d 1041 (Vt. 1990). “See 13 V.S.A. § 5232(2). In Finley , the Supreme Court considered whether appointed counsel in a post-conviction review proceeding was constitutionally required to go through the procedure set forth in Anders v.”
In re M.T., G.T., B.T. & N.T., Juveniles, 179 A.3d 754 (Vt. 2017). · cites it 2ד" 13 V.S.A. § 5232(3). "Although in theory the appointment of counsel under § 5232(3) thus remains discretionary, in practice counsel are uniformly appointed to represent needy parents in termination proceedings from trial through appeal.”
Fletcher v. Gorczyk, 624 A.2d 1132 (Vt. 1992). “” 13 V.S.A. § 5232(2). If a person under conviction of a serious crime does not have an attorney and does not waive the right to have an attorney, the court must notify the appropriate public defender “upon commencement of any later judicial proceeding relating to the same…”
In re A. C., 357 A.2d 536 (Vt. 1976). “Under 13 V.S.A. § 5232, the right to assigned counsel is extended, along with criminal respondents, to needy persons in juvenile court proceedings.”
Conway v. Cumming, 636 A.2d 735 (Vt. 1993). “Moreover, in Fletcher , the inmate was involved in a habeas proceeding for which counsel is expressly provided in 13 V.S.A. § 5232(2). No equivalent statutory right exists for representation in disciplinary proceedings.”
In Re Morse, 415 A.2d 232 (Vt. 1980). “” 13 V.S.A. §§ 5232(2), 5233(a) (3). The defendant claims that he is a needy person confined in a penal institute, and that he considers this post-conviction proceeding appropriate.”
In Re Chapman, 581 A.2d 1041 (Vt. 1990). “See 13 V.S.A. § 5232(2). In Finley , the Supreme Court considered whether appointed counsel in a post-conviction review proceeding was constitutionally required to go through the procedure set forth in Anders v.”
Fletcher v. Gorczyk, 624 A.2d 1132 (Vt. 1992). “” 13 V.S.A. § 5232(2). If a person under conviction of a serious crime does not have an attorney and does not waive the right to have an attorney, the court must notify the appropriate public defender “upon commencement of any later judicial proceeding relating to the same…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 5232(3) — 9 cases
In re R.W. & N.W., 2011 VT 124 (Vt. 2011). “” 13 V.S.A. § 5232(3); see Lassiter v. Dep’t of Social Servs.”
Mullin v. Phelps, 647 A.2d 714 (Vt. 1994). “See 13 V.S.A. § 5232(3) (court shall assign counsel to needy persons, including parents, in juvenile proceedings when interest of justice requires it).”
In re G.F., 923 A.2d 578 (Vt. 2007). “” 13 V.S.A. § 5232(3). There was no way on this record that the family court could make an informed decision that the interests of justice required counsel.”
In re C.B., Juv., 2020 VT 80 (Vt. 2020). “Father also contends that he was improperly denied standing at the merits stage of the CHINS proceeding and was erroneously not granted counsel until after the initial disposition order issued. There is no merit to father’s argument that the court failed to properly assign him…”
In re L.H., L.H. & L.H., Juveniles, 182 A.3d 612 (Vt. 2018). “§ 5112(a) ("The Court shall appoint an attorney for a child who is a party to a proceeding brought under the juvenile judicial proceedings chapters.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.