Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 7044 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : SENTENCE AND COMMITMENT

(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 7044)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2007–2025 · leading case: State v. Sommer, 2011 VT 59 (Vt. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Sommer, 2011 VT 59 (Vt. 2011). · cites it 7× “On September 3, 2009, before the DOC officially ruled on defendant’s request, defendant filed a motion requesting that the trial court order the DOC to provide the credit he sought or, in the alternative, to reduce the minimum term of his second sentence by thirteen months. The…”
State v. Kimmick, 2007 VT 45 (Vt. 2007). “This conclusion is supported by 13 V.S.A. § 7044, which requires the Commissioner of Corrections to provide the court with a computation of the shortest and longest possible sentences — taking into account good-time credit under 28 V.”
State v. Young, 925 A.2d 1016 (Vt. 2007). “” 13 V.S.A. § 7044. Section 7031(b) states that the “court shall give the person credit toward service of his sentence for any days spent in custody in connection with the offense.”
State v. Kimmick, 2007 VT 45 (Vt. 2007). “§ 7044, which requires the Commissioner of Corrections to provide the court with a computation of the shortest and longest possible sentences — taking into account good-time credit under 28 V.S.A § 811 — within thirty days after the sentence is imposed.”
Woods v. Heywood (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025). “13 V.S.A. § 7044. As our Supreme Court has noted, disputes regarding calculations can be appealed to the Commissioner.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 7044(a) — 1 case
State v. Sommer, 2011 VT 59 (Vt. 2011). “On September 3, 2009, before the DOC officially ruled on defendant’s request, defendant filed a motion requesting that the trial court order the DOC to provide the credit he sought or, in the alternative, to reduce the minimum term of his second sentence by thirteen months. The…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.