Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 7601 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 7601)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2022–2026 · leading case: op21-179.pdf, 2022 VT 40 (Vt. 2022).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
op21-179.pdf, 2022 VT 40 (Vt. 2022). “See 13 V.S.A. § 7601(4) (defining “qualifying crime”).”
Rivard v. Windham Cnty. States Attorney (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). · cites it 3× “13 V.S.A. § 7601, et seq.11 As the Vermont Supreme Court has stated 10 And, in limited circumstances, expunging such records.”
State v. Trever Hoag (Vt. 2023). “13 V.S.A. § 7601(4). Accordingly, even if the court had not abused its discretion in imposing cash bail, without considering the requisite factors, the maximum concurrent amount would have 3 been $1200, or $200 for each of the six charged offenses if ordered to be consecutive.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 7601(2) — 1 case
Rivard v. Windham Cnty. States Attorney (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026). “13 V.S.A. § 7601, et seq.11 As the Vermont Supreme Court has stated 10 And, in limited circumstances, expunging such records.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 7601(4) — 2 cases
op21-179.pdf, 2022 VT 40 (Vt. 2022). “See 13 V.S.A. § 7601(4) (defining “qualifying crime”).”
State v. Trever Hoag (Vt. 2023). “13 V.S.A. § 7601(4). Accordingly, even if the court had not abused its discretion in imposing cash bail, without considering the requisite factors, the maximum concurrent amount would have 3 been $1200, or $200 for each of the six charged offenses if ordered to be consecutive.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.