Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 15, § 1104 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 15 V.S.A. § 1104)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2022 · leading case: Raynes v. Rogers, 2008 VT 52 (Vt. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Raynes v. Rogers, 2008 VT 52 (Vt. 2008). · cites it 2× “15 V.S.A. §§ 1104(a) and 1103(c) (emphasis added).”
Rollo v. Cameron, 2013 VT 74 (Vt. 2013). · cites it 2× “15 V.S.A. § 1104. Under these circumstances, there can be no basis for finding waiver under the civil rules.”
Rapp v. Dimino, 643 A.2d 835 (Vt. 1993). “15 V.S.A. § 1104(a)(3). The defendant must have an opportunity to contest an emergency order at a hearing to be scheduled within ten days of the order.”
In re Carpenter, 197 A.3d 865 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 5× “The statute expressly limited the court's available remedies in an ex parte order to those listed in the statute, and the Legislature did not authorize a no-contact condition in that statute until 2017.”
Aaron Tudhope v. Marina Mironova (Poddubnyak) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2022). “See 15 V.S.A. § 1104(a)(1) (stating that court may issue temporary ex parte relief “[u]pon a finding that there is an immediate danger of further abuse”); V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 15, § 1104(a) — 1 case
Raynes v. Rogers, 2008 VT 52 (Vt. 2008). “15 V.S.A. §§ 1104(a) and 1103(c) (emphasis added).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 15, § 1104(a)(1) — 1 case
Aaron Tudhope v. Marina Mironova (Poddubnyak) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2022). “See 15 V.S.A. § 1104(a)(1) (stating that court may issue temporary ex parte relief “[u]pon a finding that there is an immediate danger of further abuse”); V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 15, § 1104(a)(1)(D) — 1 case
In re Carpenter, 197 A.3d 865 (Vt. 2018). “The statute expressly limited the court's available remedies in an ex parte order to those listed in the statute, and the Legislature did not authorize a no-contact condition in that statute until 2017.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 15, § 1104(a)(3) — 1 case
Rapp v. Dimino, 643 A.2d 835 (Vt. 1993). “15 V.S.A. § 1104(a)(3). The defendant must have an opportunity to contest an emergency order at a hearing to be scheduled within ten days of the order.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 15, § 1104(b) — 1 case
In re Carpenter, 197 A.3d 865 (Vt. 2018). “The statute expressly limited the court's available remedies in an ex parte order to those listed in the statute, and the Legislature did not authorize a no-contact condition in that statute until 2017.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.