(1) “Parental rights and responsibilities” means the rights and responsibilities related
to a child’s physical living arrangements, education, medical and dental care, religion,
travel, and any other matter involving a child’s welfare and upbringing.
(A) “Legal responsibility” means the rights and responsibilities to determine and control
various matters affecting a child’s welfare and upbringing, other than routine daily
care and control of the child. These matters include but are not limited to education,
medical and dental care, religion and travel arrangements. Legal responsibility may
be held solely or may be divided or shared.
(B) “Physical responsibility” means the rights and responsibilities to provide routine
daily care and control of the child subject to the right of the other parent to have
contact with the child. Physical responsibility may be held solely or may be divided
or shared.
(2) “Parent child contact” means the right of a parent who does not have physical responsibility
to have visitation with the child. (Added 1985, No. 181 (Adj. Sess.), § 2; amended 2019, No. 167 (Adj. Sess.), § 19, eff. October 7, 2020.)
Cabot v. Cabot, 697 A.2d 644 (Vt. 1997). · cites it 4דSee 15 V.S.A. § 664(1). Ellen was granted sole physical responsibility and shared legal responsibility for the child.”
Tracy McIntire Quinones v. Patrick C. Bouffard, 179 A.3d 173 (Vt. 2017). · cites it 4דSee 15 V.S.A. § 664(1)(B). She has not presented arguments concerning other significant child-rearing issues, such as those involving the child’s religious upbringing, schooling, or travel, to support the argument that the trial court abused its discretion in declining to modify…”
Gazo v. Gazo, 697 A.2d 342 (Vt. 1997). · cites it 4ד§ 666(b); see also 15 V.S.A. § 664(1) (defining scope of "parental rights and responsibilities").”
Pigeon v. Pigeon, 782 A.2d 1236 (Vt. 2001). · cites it 4דSee 15 V.S.A. §§ 664, 668. The court made the following findings on changed circumstances: the child "is now 10 years old, in school, involved in after-school activities, and not at home for most of the time on week days during the school year" and "[u]nder the terms of the…”
Miller-Jenkins v. Miller-Jenkins, 637 S.E.2d 330 (Va. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2ד” Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 15, § 664 (1). And the term “parent child contact” means “the right of a parent who does not have physical responsibility to have visitation with the child.”
DeBeaumont v. Goodrich, 644 A.2d 843 (Vt. 1994). · cites it 2ד" 15 V.S.A. § 664(1). See Bancroft v. Bancroft, 154 Vt.”
Jakab v. Jakab, 664 A.2d 261 (Vt. 1995). · cites it 2דAlthough we reject defendant’s arguments, we strike part of the visitation order because it violates 15 V.S.A. § 664(1). In all other respects, we affirm.”
Gates v. Gates, 716 A.2d 794 (Vt. 1998). · cites it 2דSee 15 V.S.A. § 664. In fact, the court found just the opposite that the parties have been able to effectively cooperate in such areas.”
Jason C. Barrows v. Jessica Easton, 2020 VT 2 (Vt. 2020). · cites it 2ד” 15 V.S.A. § 664(1) (emphasis added). This category of rights and responsibilities is broken into two components.”
Chase v. Bowen, 2008 VT 12 (Vt. 2008). “” 15 V.S.A. § 664(1)(B). Although father has substantial contact with the boys, mother is still the custodial parent and retains authority regarding the boys’ “routine daily care and control,” id.”
Heffernan v. Harbeson, 2004 VT 98 (Vt. 2004). “” 15 V.S.A § 664(1)(A). In settling upon these arrangements, the court considered “the best interests of the child” factors set forth in 15 V.”
Fenwick v. Fenwick, 114 S.W.3d 767 (Ky. 2003). “§ 5302 (defining legal custody as shared decision making in the arenas of medical care, religion and education) (West 2001); VT. STAT. ANN. tit. 15, § 664(1)(A) (1989) (outlining the parameters of legal responsibility as matters concerning education, medical and dental care,…”
Cabot v. Cabot, 697 A.2d 644 (Vt. 1997). “See 15 V.S.A. § 664(1). Ellen was granted sole physical responsibility and shared legal responsibility for the child.”
DeBeaumont v. Goodrich, 644 A.2d 843 (Vt. 1994). “" 15 V.S.A. § 664(1). See Bancroft v. Bancroft, 154 Vt.”
Gazo v. Gazo, 697 A.2d 342 (Vt. 1997). “§ 666(b); see also 15 V.S.A. § 664(1) (defining scope of "parental rights and responsibilities").”
Gazo v. Gazo, 697 A.2d 342 (Vt. 1997). “§ 666(b); see also 15 V.S.A. § 664(1) (defining scope of "parental rights and responsibilities").”
Pigeon v. Pigeon, 782 A.2d 1236 (Vt. 2001). “See 15 V.S.A. §§ 664, 668. The court made the following findings on changed circumstances: the child "is now 10 years old, in school, involved in after-school activities, and not at home for most of the time on week days during the school year" and "[u]nder the terms of the…”
Heffernan v. Harbeson, 2004 VT 98 (Vt. 2004). “” 15 V.S.A § 664(1)(A). In settling upon these arrangements, the court considered “the best interests of the child” factors set forth in 15 V.”
Fenwick v. Fenwick, 114 S.W.3d 767 (Ky. 2003). “§ 5302 (defining legal custody as shared decision making in the arenas of medical care, religion and education) (West 2001); VT. STAT. ANN. tit. 15, § 664(1)(A) (1989) (outlining the parameters of legal responsibility as matters concerning education, medical and dental care,…”
Cabot v. Cabot, 697 A.2d 644 (Vt. 1997). “See 15 V.S.A. § 664(1). Ellen was granted sole physical responsibility and shared legal responsibility for the child.”
Tracy McIntire Quinones v. Patrick C. Bouffard, 179 A.3d 173 (Vt. 2017). “See 15 V.S.A. § 664(1)(B). She has not presented arguments concerning other significant child-rearing issues, such as those involving the child’s religious upbringing, schooling, or travel, to support the argument that the trial court abused its discretion in declining to modify…”
Chase v. Bowen, 2008 VT 12 (Vt. 2008). “” 15 V.S.A. § 664(1)(B). Although father has substantial contact with the boys, mother is still the custodial parent and retains authority regarding the boys’ “routine daily care and control,” id.”
Jason C. Barrows v. Jessica Easton, 2020 VT 2 (Vt. 2020). “” 15 V.S.A. § 664(1) (emphasis added). This category of rights and responsibilities is broken into two components.”
Tracy McIntire Quinones v. Patrick C. Bouffard, 179 A.3d 173 (Vt. 2017). “See 15 V.S.A. § 664(1)(B). She has not presented arguments concerning other significant child-rearing issues, such as those involving the child’s religious upbringing, schooling, or travel, to support the argument that the trial court abused its discretion in declining to modify…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.