Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 16, § 2007 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 003 : NEGOTIATIONS

(Cite as: 16 V.S.A. § 2007)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1986–2018 · leading case: Negotiations Comm. of Caledonia Cent. Supervisory Union v. Caledonia Cent. Educ. Assn., 184 A.3d 236 (Vt. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Negotiations Comm. of Caledonia Cent. Supervisory Union v. Caledonia Cent. Educ. Assn., 184 A.3d 236 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 5× “organization" to "meet together at reasonable times, and upon request of either party" to negotiate in good faith); 16 V.S.A. § 2007 (delegating authority to "either party" to request unresolved issues be submitted to factfinding committee).”
Chittenden South Educ. Ass'n v. Hinesburg Sch. Dist., 514 A.2d 1065 (Vt. 1986). “See 16 V.S.A. § 2007. The fact-finder’s final report, issued on February 19, 1985, recommended a compromise solution.”
CHITTENDEN SO. EDUC. v. Hinesburg Sch. Dist., 514 A.2d 1065 (Vt. 1986). “See 16 V.S.A. § 2007. The fact-finder's final report, issued on February 19, 1985, recommended a compromise solution.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 16, § 2007(a) — 1 case
Negotiations Comm. of Caledonia Cent. Supervisory Union v. Caledonia Cent. Educ. Assn., 184 A.3d 236 (Vt. 2018). “organization" to "meet together at reasonable times, and upon request of either party" to negotiate in good faith); 16 V.S.A. § 2007 (delegating authority to "either party" to request unresolved issues be submitted to factfinding committee).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 16, § 2007(d) — 1 case
Negotiations Comm. of Caledonia Cent. Supervisory Union v. Caledonia Cent. Educ. Assn., 184 A.3d 236 (Vt. 2018). “organization" to "meet together at reasonable times, and upon request of either party" to negotiate in good faith); 16 V.S.A. § 2007 (delegating authority to "either party" to request unresolved issues be submitted to factfinding committee).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.