Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 16, § 2008 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 003 : NEGOTIATIONS

(Cite as: 16 V.S.A. § 2008)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1977–1986 · leading case: Chittenden South Educ. Ass'n v. Hinesburg Sch. Dist., 514 A.2d 1065 (Vt. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Chittenden South Educ. Ass'n v. Hinesburg Sch. Dist., 514 A.2d 1065 (Vt. 1986). · cites it 10× “The Chittenden South Education Association, Hinesburg Unit (Association) cross-appeals the VLRB determination that the declaration of finality under 16 V.S.A. § 2008 relieved the School Board of any further obligation to negotiate with the Association during the 1984-85 school…”
North Country Educ. Ass'n v. Brighton Sch. Bd., 380 A.2d 60 (Vt. 1977). · cites it 2× “*452 The defendants oppose the motion to dismiss because it leaves unreviewed the portion of the Board’s order that finds the defendants guilty of an unfair labor practice as well as the board’s stated view of the proper interpretation of 16 V.S.A. § 2008. That section makes…”
CHITTENDEN SO. EDUC. v. Hinesburg Sch. Dist., 514 A.2d 1065 (Vt. 1986). · cites it 10× “The Chittenden South Education Association, Hinesburg Unit (Association) cross-appeals the VLRB determination that the declaration of finality under 16 V.S.A. § 2008 relieved the School Board of any further obligation to negotiate with the Association during the 1984-85 school…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.