Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 16, § 563 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 004 : OTHER PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 16 V.S.A. § 563)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1971–2024 · leading case: Rutz v. Essex Junction Prudential Comm., 457 A.2d 1368 (Vt. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Rutz v. Essex Junction Prudential Comm., 457 A.2d 1368 (Vt. 1983). · cites it 4× “§ 563 grants to school boards, including the defendant prudential committee, the power to establish educational policies, and to prescribe rules and regulations for the conduct and management of their respective schools. See 16 V.”
Danville Bd. of Sch. Directors v. Fifield, 315 A.2d 473 (Vt. 1974). · cites it 3× “This is so, argues the Board, because 16 V.S.A. § 563 gives school boards the sole power to hire and dismiss teachers, and such power cannot be delegated.”
Cyr v. Addison Rutland Supervisory Union, 60 F. Supp. 3d 536 (D. Vt. 2014). “” Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 16, § 563 (1)(2). The board has “possession, care, control and management of the property of the school district, subject to the authority vested in the electorate or any school district official” and must “keep the school buildings and grounds in good…”
Rouleau v. Williamstown Sch. Bd., 2005 VT 131 (Vt. 2005). “§ 563 and emphasizing that “[s]tudent discipline is an important and necessary element of school management”), but also the undesirability of exhaustive judicial review of each and every decision of local school administrators. Our review balances competing considerations of…”
Cole v. Town of Hartford Sch. Dist., 306 A.2d 101 (Vt. 1973). · cites it 3× “The powers of school boards are set out in 16 V.S.A. § 563. Subsection 12 of such section provides: “Upon prior recommendation by the superintendent [the school board shall] employ and dismiss such persons as may be required to carry out the work of the school district.”
Petitions of Davenport, 283 A.2d 452 (Vt. 1971). “) See 16 V.S.A. § 563. 1969, No. 298 (Adj. Sess.”
Barnes v. Bd. of Directors, Mount Anthony Union High Sch. Dist. (No. 14), 418 F. Supp. 845 (D. Vt. 1976). “powers of the school board are more specifically defined and generously delegated by 16 V.S.A. § 563, including the mandate to “(E)xercise the general powers given to a legislative branch of a municipality.”
LaFlamme v. Essex Junction Sch. Dist., 750 A.2d 993 (Vt. 2000). “16 V.S.A. § 563(1), (2), (15), (20). Also, Robert’s Rules of Order govern the conduct of school board meetings.”
Bicknell v. Vergennes Union High Sch. Bd. of Directors, 475 F. Supp. 615 (D. Vt. 1979). “Vt.Stat.Ann. tit. 16, § 563 defines the powers of school boards, which include authority to: (1) Determine the educational policies of the school district, and prescribe rules and regulations for the conduct and management of the public schools in the district.”
Work v. Mount Abraham Union High Sch. Bd. of Directors, 483 A.2d 258 (Vt. 1984). “Title 16 V.S.A. § 563 provides: The school board of a school district, in addition to other duties specifically assigned by law, shall: (12) Upon prior recommendation by the superintendent employ and dismiss such persons as may be required to carry out the work of the school…”
A.M. v. French (D. Vt. 2019). · cites it 2× “” 16 V.S.A. § 563(24). Because the DEP is a “cocurricular’” program, and because the State seeks to integrate home study students into cocurricular public education, there is a rational and non-arbitrary basis for treating home study students differently than their private…”
O'Hara v. Proulx, 346 A.2d 532 (Vt. 1975). · cites it 2× “§ 1222(a), commanding the adoption of a transportation policy, also bring into play the requirements of 16 V.S.A. § 563(1), relating to adoption of regulations, as well as the provisions of 16 V.”
Show all 16 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 16, § 563(1) — 3 cases
Rutz v. Essex Junction Prudential Comm., 457 A.2d 1368 (Vt. 1983). “§ 563 grants to school boards, including the defendant prudential committee, the power to establish educational policies, and to prescribe rules and regulations for the conduct and management of their respective schools. See 16 V.”
LaFlamme v. Essex Junction Sch. Dist., 750 A.2d 993 (Vt. 2000). “16 V.S.A. § 563(1), (2), (15), (20). Also, Robert’s Rules of Order govern the conduct of school board meetings.”
O'Hara v. Proulx, 346 A.2d 532 (Vt. 1975). “§ 1222(a), commanding the adoption of a transportation policy, also bring into play the requirements of 16 V.S.A. § 563(1), relating to adoption of regulations, as well as the provisions of 16 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 16, § 563(12) — 1 case
Cole v. Town of Hartford Sch. Dist., 306 A.2d 101 (Vt. 1973). “The powers of school boards are set out in 16 V.S.A. § 563. Subsection 12 of such section provides: “Upon prior recommendation by the superintendent [the school board shall] employ and dismiss such persons as may be required to carry out the work of the school district.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 16, § 563(15) — 1 case
Skiff v. South Burlington Sch. Dist. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 16, § 563(2) — 1 case
corriveau v. windham (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 16, § 563(24) — 1 case
A.M. v. French (D. Vt. 2019). “” 16 V.S.A. § 563(24). Because the DEP is a “cocurricular’” program, and because the State seeks to integrate home study students into cocurricular public education, there is a rational and non-arbitrary basis for treating home study students differently than their private…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 16, § 563(3) — 1 case
Vermont Coalition for Cmty. Schs., Inc. v. Harwood Unified Union Sch. Dist. (D. Vt. 2020).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 16, § 563(4) — 1 case
O'Hara v. Proulx, 346 A.2d 532 (Vt. 1975). “§ 1222(a), commanding the adoption of a transportation policy, also bring into play the requirements of 16 V.S.A. § 563(1), relating to adoption of regulations, as well as the provisions of 16 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 16, § 563(5) — 1 case
Clogston v. Burlington Sch. Dist. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.