Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 17 Chapter 34A
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 17, § 1909 (2026)

Review

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 17 V.S.A. § 1909)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1972–2012 · leading case: In Re Reapportionment of Town of Hartland, 624 A.2d 323 (Vt. 1993).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Reapportionment of Town of Hartland, 624 A.2d 323 (Vt. 1993). · cites it 8× “" 17 V.S.A. § 1909(a) (emphasis added). In the event we conclude that constitutional or statutory criteria have not been met, we are required to "forward [our] opinion and decision to the general assembly which shall forthwith revise and correct the apportionment law in light of…”
In re Senate Jt. Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176, 83 So. 3d 597 (Fla. 2012). · cites it 2× “IV, § 3(b); Iowa Const, art. Ill, § 36; Kan. Const, art. X, § 1(b); Mass.”
In Re Senate Bill 177, 318 A.2d 157 (Vt. 1974). · cites it 4× “The committee to which it was referred amended it completely, and it became Senate Bill 177.”
In re Reapportionment of Towns of Woodbury & Worcester, 2004 VT 92 (Vt. 2004). · cites it 2× “17 V.S.A. § 1909(a), (f). However, we review the Legislature’s redistricting plan with considerable deference.”
In Re Senate Bill 177, 294 A.2d 653 (1972). · cites it 2× “17 V.S.A. § 1909 provides that, if the reapportionment plan is attacked, the issue shall be passed directly before this Court, and limits the appeal to issues involving the constitutionality of the proposed plan or relating to its conformity with the provisions of 17 V.”
In Re Senate Bill 177, 294 A.2d 657 (1972). “Jurisdiction of the cause was retained by this Court as provided for by 17 V.S.A. § 1909(e). The report and plan of the Legislative Apportionment Board was filed on the 26th day of July 1972, and reads as follows: “PLAN OF LEGISLATIVE APPORTIONMENT BOARD The Legislative…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 17, § 1909(a) — 2 cases
In Re Reapportionment of Town of Hartland, 624 A.2d 323 (Vt. 1993). “" 17 V.S.A. § 1909(a) (emphasis added). In the event we conclude that constitutional or statutory criteria have not been met, we are required to "forward [our] opinion and decision to the general assembly which shall forthwith revise and correct the apportionment law in light of…”
In re Reapportionment of Towns of Woodbury & Worcester, 2004 VT 92 (Vt. 2004). “17 V.S.A. § 1909(a), (f). However, we review the Legislature’s redistricting plan with considerable deference.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 17, § 1909(b) — 1 case
In Re Senate Bill 177, 318 A.2d 157 (Vt. 1974). “The committee to which it was referred amended it completely, and it became Senate Bill 177.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 17, § 1909(d) — 3 cases
In Re Reapportionment of Town of Hartland, 624 A.2d 323 (Vt. 1993). “" 17 V.S.A. § 1909(a) (emphasis added). In the event we conclude that constitutional or statutory criteria have not been met, we are required to "forward [our] opinion and decision to the general assembly which shall forthwith revise and correct the apportionment law in light of…”
In Re Senate Bill 177, 318 A.2d 157 (Vt. 1974). “The committee to which it was referred amended it completely, and it became Senate Bill 177.”
In re Reapportionment of Towns of Woodbury & Worcester, 2004 VT 92 (Vt. 2004). “17 V.S.A. § 1909(a), (f). However, we review the Legislature’s redistricting plan with considerable deference.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 17, § 1909(e) — 4 cases
In Re Reapportionment of Town of Hartland, 624 A.2d 323 (Vt. 1993). “" 17 V.S.A. § 1909(a) (emphasis added). In the event we conclude that constitutional or statutory criteria have not been met, we are required to "forward [our] opinion and decision to the general assembly which shall forthwith revise and correct the apportionment law in light of…”
In Re Senate Bill 177, 318 A.2d 157 (Vt. 1974). “The committee to which it was referred amended it completely, and it became Senate Bill 177.”
In Re Senate Bill 177, 294 A.2d 653 (1972). “17 V.S.A. § 1909 provides that, if the reapportionment plan is attacked, the issue shall be passed directly before this Court, and limits the appeal to issues involving the constitutionality of the proposed plan or relating to its conformity with the provisions of 17 V.”
In Re Senate Bill 177, 294 A.2d 657 (1972). “Jurisdiction of the cause was retained by this Court as provided for by 17 V.S.A. § 1909(e). The report and plan of the Legislative Apportionment Board was filed on the 26th day of July 1972, and reads as follows: “PLAN OF LEGISLATIVE APPORTIONMENT BOARD The Legislative…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.