Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 17, § 2642 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : TOWN MEETINGS AND LOCAL ELECTIONS IN GENERAL

(Cite as: 17 V.S.A. § 2642)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1989–2020 · leading case: Robert A. Skiff, Jr. v. South Burlington Sch. Dist., 201 A.3d 969 (Vt. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Robert A. Skiff, Jr. v. South Burlington Sch. Dist., 201 A.3d 969 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 8× “Therefore, we reverse the trial court's order and remand for entry of judgment in favor of the District.”
Pominville v. Addison Cent. Supervisory Union, 575 A.2d 196 (Vt. 1990). · cites it 3× “17 V.S.A. § 2642(a). 2 Against the general authority of § 2642(a), the Legislature has enacted specific procedures for voting on school budgets by Australian ballot.”
Addison Cnty. Cmty. Action v. City of Vergennes, 565 A.2d 233 (Vt. 1989). “Social service programs, for which a town or incorporated village may appropriate sums of money, include, but are not limited to: transportation, nutrition, medical, day care, and other rehabilitative services for persons with low incomes, senior citizens, children, disabled…”
Santi v. Roxbury Town Sch. Dist., 685 A.2d 301 (Vt. 1996). “They claimed the right to do so under 17 V.S.A. § 2642(a), authorizing five percent of the voters to place an article on the agenda of the annual meeting.”
Clift v. City of South Burlington, 917 A.2d 483 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 4× “[The warning] shall, by separate articles, specifically indicate the business to be transacted, to include the offices and the questions to be voted upon.”
Skiff v. South Burlington Sch. Dist. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). · cites it 9× “There, the South Burlington city council 13 The ballot initiative options set forth in 17 V.S.A. §§ 2642 and 2643 were not enacted into law until much later.”
Vermont Coalition for Cmty. Schs., Inc. v. Harwood Unified Union Sch. Dist. (D. Vt. 2020). · cites it 2× “Count I alleges that HUUSD violated 17 V.S.A. § 2642 by failing to place the petitioned articles on its annual meeting warning and ballot.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 17, § 2642(a) — 6 cases
Robert A. Skiff, Jr. v. South Burlington Sch. Dist., 201 A.3d 969 (Vt. 2018). “Therefore, we reverse the trial court's order and remand for entry of judgment in favor of the District.”
Pominville v. Addison Cent. Supervisory Union, 575 A.2d 196 (Vt. 1990). “17 V.S.A. § 2642(a). 2 Against the general authority of § 2642(a), the Legislature has enacted specific procedures for voting on school budgets by Australian ballot.”
Addison Cnty. Cmty. Action v. City of Vergennes, 565 A.2d 233 (Vt. 1989). “Social service programs, for which a town or incorporated village may appropriate sums of money, include, but are not limited to: transportation, nutrition, medical, day care, and other rehabilitative services for persons with low incomes, senior citizens, children, disabled…”
Santi v. Roxbury Town Sch. Dist., 685 A.2d 301 (Vt. 1996). “They claimed the right to do so under 17 V.S.A. § 2642(a), authorizing five percent of the voters to place an article on the agenda of the annual meeting.”
Clift v. City of South Burlington, 917 A.2d 483 (Vt. 2007). “[The warning] shall, by separate articles, specifically indicate the business to be transacted, to include the offices and the questions to be voted upon.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 17, § 2642(a)(2) — 1 case
Robert A. Skiff, Jr. v. South Burlington Sch. Dist., 201 A.3d 969 (Vt. 2018). “Therefore, we reverse the trial court's order and remand for entry of judgment in favor of the District.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 17, § 2642(a)(3)(A) — 2 cases
Robert A. Skiff, Jr. v. South Burlington Sch. Dist., 201 A.3d 969 (Vt. 2018). “Therefore, we reverse the trial court's order and remand for entry of judgment in favor of the District.”
Skiff v. South Burlington Sch. Dist. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017). “There, the South Burlington city council 13 The ballot initiative options set forth in 17 V.S.A. §§ 2642 and 2643 were not enacted into law until much later.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.