Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 17, § 2664 (2026)

Budget

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : TOWN MEETINGS AND LOCAL ELECTIONS IN GENERAL

(Cite as: 17 V.S.A. § 2664)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1985–2008 · leading case: Mooney v. Town of Stowe, 2008 VT 19 (Vt. 2008).
Mooney v. Town of Stowe, 2008 VT 19 (Vt. 2008). “Not only did voters demand that the budget be approved by Australian ballot, they required, by the language of the amended article, that the budget be decomposed and that its individual parts be voted upon separately.”
Addison Cnty. Cmty. Action v. City of Vergennes, 565 A.2d 233 (Vt. 1989). “It was interpreted by the trial judge as a contest on whether the requested appropriations would be “necessary town expenses” as that term is used in 17 V.S.A. § 2664. In response to the motion the trial court held an evidentiary hearing on this issue and found specifically that…”
Porter v. Town of Newark, 488 A.2d 769 (Vt. 1985). “17 V.S.A. § 2664. The grand list is based on the listed value of the real and personal property in the town.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.