Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 18 Chapter 84
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4234 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : REGULATED DRUGS

(Cite as: 18 V.S.A. § 4234)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1999–2020 · leading case: State v. McAllister, 2008 VT 3 (Vt. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. McAllister, 2008 VT 3 (Vt. 2008). · cites it 4× “§ 4249, and one count of possession of a narcotic drug, 18 V.S.A. § 4234(a). At the close of the State’s evidence, defendant moved to suppress pills that were taken from her during a strip-search at the Southeast State Correctional Facility, arguing that the State had not…”
State v. Erwin, 2011 VT 41 (Vt. 2011). · cites it 2× “We similarly reject defendant’s assertion that the court committed plain error by failing to sua sponte acquit him of “knowingly and unlawfully” possessing a narcotic drug under 18 V.S.A. § 4234(a). Defendant suggests that the State improperly relied solely on the results of his…”
State v. Bryan L. Perrault, 173 A.3d 335 (Vt. 2017). · cites it 5× “He also claims that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he knowingly possessed a depressant or stimulant in violation of 18 V.S.A. § 4234(a)(1). We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied defendant's motion for a new trial and that…”
People v. Martinez, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3506 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999). “§ 39-17-418 ; Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4234 (a)(1); W.”
State v. Lamonda, 2011 VT 101 (Vt. 2011). · cites it 2× “She moved to suppress the evidence against her, arguing that there were no exigent circumstances to justify the warrantless search of her purse.”
State v. Kirby Davis, 2020 VT 20 (Vt. 2020). · cites it 2× “See 18 V.S.A. § 4234; see also Vt. Dep’t of Health, Regulated Drug Rule 3.”
State v. Kirby Davis, 2020 VT 20 (Vt. 2020). · cites it 2× “See 18 V.S.A. § 4234; see also Vt. Dep’t of Health, Regulated Drug Rule 3.”
State v. Brent Dean Booker, Jr., 2020 VT 67 (Vt. 2020). “§ 7559(e); one count of possessing a narcotic drug, 18 V.S.A. § 4234(a)(1); and one count of simple assault on a protected professional, 13 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4234(a) — 2 cases
State v. McAllister, 2008 VT 3 (Vt. 2008). “§ 4249, and one count of possession of a narcotic drug, 18 V.S.A. § 4234(a). At the close of the State’s evidence, defendant moved to suppress pills that were taken from her during a strip-search at the Southeast State Correctional Facility, arguing that the State had not…”
State v. Erwin, 2011 VT 41 (Vt. 2011). “We similarly reject defendant’s assertion that the court committed plain error by failing to sua sponte acquit him of “knowingly and unlawfully” possessing a narcotic drug under 18 V.S.A. § 4234(a). Defendant suggests that the State improperly relied solely on the results of his…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4234(a)(1) — 5 cases
State v. Bryan L. Perrault, 173 A.3d 335 (Vt. 2017). “He also claims that the evidence was insufficient to establish that he knowingly possessed a depressant or stimulant in violation of 18 V.S.A. § 4234(a)(1). We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied defendant's motion for a new trial and that…”
State v. Erwin, 2011 VT 41 (Vt. 2011). “We similarly reject defendant’s assertion that the court committed plain error by failing to sua sponte acquit him of “knowingly and unlawfully” possessing a narcotic drug under 18 V.S.A. § 4234(a). Defendant suggests that the State improperly relied solely on the results of his…”
State v. McAllister, 2008 VT 3 (Vt. 2008). “§ 4249, and one count of possession of a narcotic drug, 18 V.S.A. § 4234(a). At the close of the State’s evidence, defendant moved to suppress pills that were taken from her during a strip-search at the Southeast State Correctional Facility, arguing that the State had not…”
State v. Lamonda, 2011 VT 101 (Vt. 2011). “She moved to suppress the evidence against her, arguing that there were no exigent circumstances to justify the warrantless search of her purse.”
State v. Brent Dean Booker, Jr., 2020 VT 67 (Vt. 2020). “§ 7559(e); one count of possessing a narcotic drug, 18 V.S.A. § 4234(a)(1); and one count of simple assault on a protected professional, 13 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.