Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 18 Chapter 84
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4235 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : REGULATED DRUGS

(Cite as: 18 V.S.A. § 4235)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2021 · leading case: In re C.C., 2009 VT 108 (Vt. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re C.C., 2009 VT 108 (Vt. 2009). “Later, defendant was charged with possessing less than 2 grams of ecstasy in violation of 18 V.S.A. § 4235(b)(1). Defendant entered a denial in response to this charge and then filed a motion to suppress the ecstasy pill.”
State v. Kirby Davis, 2020 VT 20 (Vt. 2020). “See 18 V.S.A. § 4235. It is difficult to conceive how such proof could ever be provided.”
State v. Phillip Walker-Brazie & Brandi-Lena Butterfield, 2021 VT 75 (Vt. 2021). “§ 4230(a)(2), and one count of possessing ten or more doses of a hallucinogenic drug, in violation of 18 V.S.A. § 4235(b)(2). Butterfield was charged with one count of possessing marijuana, in violation of 18 V.”
State v. Kirby Davis, 2020 VT 20 (Vt. 2020). “See 18 V.S.A. § 4235. It is difficult to conceive how such proof could ever be provided.”
In Re Cc, 2009 VT 108 (Vt. 2009). “Later, defendant was charged with possessing less than 2 grams of ecstasy in violation of 18 V.S.A. § 4235(b)(1). Defendant entered a denial in response to this charge and then filed a motion to suppress the ecstasy pill.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4235(b)(1) — 2 cases
In re C.C., 2009 VT 108 (Vt. 2009). “Later, defendant was charged with possessing less than 2 grams of ecstasy in violation of 18 V.S.A. § 4235(b)(1). Defendant entered a denial in response to this charge and then filed a motion to suppress the ecstasy pill.”
In Re Cc, 2009 VT 108 (Vt. 2009). “Later, defendant was charged with possessing less than 2 grams of ecstasy in violation of 18 V.S.A. § 4235(b)(1). Defendant entered a denial in response to this charge and then filed a motion to suppress the ecstasy pill.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 4235(b)(2) — 1 case
State v. Phillip Walker-Brazie & Brandi-Lena Butterfield, 2021 VT 75 (Vt. 2021). “§ 4230(a)(2), and one count of possessing ten or more doses of a hallucinogenic drug, in violation of 18 V.S.A. § 4235(b)(2). Butterfield was charged with one count of possessing marijuana, in violation of 18 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.