(a) When the application is filed, the court shall appoint counsel for the proposed patient
and transmit a copy of the application, the physician’s certificate, if any, and a
notice of hearing to the proposed patient; his or her attorney, guardian, or any person
having custody and control of the proposed patient; the State’s Attorney; or the Attorney
General, and any other person the court believes has a concern for the proposed patient’s
welfare. A copy of the notice of hearing shall also be transmitted to the applicant
and certifying physician.
(b) The notice of hearing shall set forth the date and time of the hearing and shall contain
a list of the proposed patient’s rights at the hearing.
(c) If the court has reason to believe that notice to the proposed patient will be likely
to cause injury to the proposed patient or others, it shall direct the proposed patient’s
counsel to give the proposed patient oral notice prior to written notice under circumstances
most likely to reduce likelihood of injury. (Added 1977, No. 252 (Adj. Sess.), § 20.)
In re G.G., 2017 VT 10 (Vt. 2017). “" 18 V.S.A. §§ 7613 (appointment of counsel), 7621 (incorporating § 7613 for continued treatment proceedings), 7625 (incorporating § 7613 for involuntary medication).”
In re G. K., 514 A.2d 1031 (Vt. 1986). “See 18 V.S.A. § 7613. Moreover, the State was held to a clear and convincing standard of proof.”
Goodemote v. Scripture, 440 A.2d 150 (Vt. 1981). “18 V.S.A. § 7613(a). Furthermore, hospitalization may be ordered only after it has been determined that available alternatives to hospitalization are inappropriate.”
In re C. E. E., 421 A.2d 1312 (Vt. 1980). · cites it 2ד18 V.S.A. § 7613. After the involuntary treatment proceedings have been commenced, the district court is empowered to authorize an examination of the proposed patient.”
In Re Cee, 421 A.2d 1312 (Vt. 1980). · cites it 2ד18 V.S.A. § 7613. After the involuntary treatment proceedings have been commenced, the district court is empowered to authorize an examination of the proposed patient.”
In Re Gk, 514 A.2d 1031 (Vt. 1986). “Each appellee was accorded a hearing at which the State bore the burden of establishing that he was "suffering from mental illness and, as a result of that mental illness, his capacity to exercise self-control, judgment, or discretion in the conduct of his affairs and social…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 7613(a) — 1 case
Goodemote v. Scripture, 440 A.2d 150 (Vt. 1981). “18 V.S.A. § 7613(a). Furthermore, hospitalization may be ordered only after it has been determined that available alternatives to hospitalization are inappropriate.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.