Notes of Decisions
Cited in
8
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 2002–2021 · leading case:
J.L. v. Miller, 817 A.2d 1 (Vt. 2002).
J.L. v. Miller, 817 A.2d 1 (Vt. 2002).
· cites it 4× “18 V.S.A § 7629(a). However, while Act 114 provides a new and different set of procedures for the treatment of individuals facing *290 involuntary medication, it also has some substantial similarities to the J.”
In re G.G., 2017 VT 10, 165 A.3d 1075.
· cites it 2× “See 18 V.S.A. § 7629(b) (explaining Legislature's intention to enact involuntary medication laws in accordance with principle that involuntary medication "should be avoided whenever possible because the distress and insult to human dignity that results from compelling a person…”
In re L.A., 2006 VT 118, 912 A.2d 977.
· cites it 2× “18 V.S.A. § 7629(c). As long as patient can understand the consequences of refusing medication, the statute permits him to do so, even if refusing medication will be to his detriment.”
Hargrave v. Vermont, 340 F.3d 27 (2d Cir. 2003).
“Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 7629 (d) (“This act will render the J.”
In re L.A., 2008 VT 5, 945 A.2d 356.
· cites it 2× “We find unpersuasive the State’s argument that the statement of legislative intent contained in 18 V.S.A. § 7629 demonstrates that the Legislature would not have wanted an automatic stay to apply to involuntary-medication orders.”
In re La, 2006 VT 118, 912 A.2d 977.
· cites it 2× “18 V.S.A. § 7629(c). As long as patient can understand the consequences of refusing medication, the statute permits him to do so, even if refusing medication will be to his detriment.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 7629(a): 1 case
J.L. v. Miller, 817 A.2d 1 (Vt. 2002).
“18 V.S.A § 7629(a). However, while Act 114 provides a new and different set of procedures for the treatment of individuals facing *290 involuntary medication, it also has some substantial similarities to the J.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 7629(b): 1 case
In re G.G., 2017 VT 10, 165 A.3d 1075.
“See 18 V.S.A. § 7629(b) (explaining Legislature's intention to enact involuntary medication laws in accordance with principle that involuntary medication "should be avoided whenever possible because the distress and insult to human dignity that results from compelling a person…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 7629(c): 4 cases
In re L.A., 2006 VT 118, 912 A.2d 977.
“18 V.S.A. § 7629(c). As long as patient can understand the consequences of refusing medication, the statute permits him to do so, even if refusing medication will be to his detriment.”
In re G.G., 2017 VT 10, 165 A.3d 1075.
“See 18 V.S.A. § 7629(b) (explaining Legislature's intention to enact involuntary medication laws in accordance with principle that involuntary medication "should be avoided whenever possible because the distress and insult to human dignity that results from compelling a person…”
In re L.A., 2008 VT 5, 945 A.2d 356.
“We find unpersuasive the State’s argument that the statement of legislative intent contained in 18 V.S.A. § 7629 demonstrates that the Legislature would not have wanted an automatic stay to apply to involuntary-medication orders.”
In re La, 2006 VT 118, 912 A.2d 977.
“18 V.S.A. § 7629(c). As long as patient can understand the consequences of refusing medication, the statute permits him to do so, even if refusing medication will be to his detriment.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 18, § 7629(d): 2 cases
J.L. v. Miller, 817 A.2d 1 (Vt. 2002).
“18 V.S.A § 7629(a). However, while Act 114 provides a new and different set of procedures for the treatment of individuals facing *290 involuntary medication, it also has some substantial similarities to the J.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.