(a) A party dissatisfied with a decision of the Transportation Board as to the amount
or apportionment of damages awarded may appeal to a Superior Court where the land
is situated within 30 days after the date of the decision, and any number of persons
aggrieved may join in the appeal.
(b) A party appealing the award of the Board is entitled to a jury trial in the Superior
Court upon demand.
(c) A party aggrieved by a Superior Court decision on damages under this section or section
511 of this chapter may appeal to the Supreme Court in accordance with the Vermont
Rules of Appellate Procedure. (Added 1985, No. 269 (Adj. Sess.), § 1; amended 1993, No. 172 (Adj. Sess.), § 26; 2011, No. 126 (Adj. Sess.), § 2.)
William E. v. Agency of Transp., 2006 VT 68 (Vt. 2006). “The court denied the Ehrharts’ motion and granted partial summary judgment to the Agency.”
Raymond v. Chittenden Cnty. Circumferential High., 604 A.2d 1281 (Vt. 1992). “Plaintiffs appealed to superior court pursuant to 19 V.S.A. § 513(a). The parties stipulated that the land should be considered as fully permitted for plaintiffs’ proposed subdivision development.”
In re Appeal of Condemnation Award to 89-2 Realty, 566 A.2d 979 (Vt. 1989). “19 V.S.A. § 513. After a bench trial, the court increased the award to $53,714, which reflected additional “costs to cure” (i.”
Raymond v. Chittenden Cnty. Circumferential High., 604 A.2d 1281 (Vt. 1992). “Plaintiffs appealed to superior court pursuant to 19 V.S.A. § 513(a). The parties stipulated that the land should be considered as fully permitted for plaintiffs’ proposed subdivision development.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.