The selectboard shall notify the Commissioner of Forests, Parks and Recreation when
it has filed a petition to discontinue a highway under this subchapter. The selectboard
may designate the proposed discontinued highway as a trail, in which case the right-of-way
shall be continued at the same width. The Commissioner of Forests, Parks and Recreation
with the approval of the selectboard may also make this designation. If the discontinued
highway is not designated as a trail, the right-of-way shall belong to the owners
of the adjoining lands. If it is located between the lands of two different owners,
it shall be returned to the lots to which it originally belonged, if they can be determined;
if not, it shall be equally divided between the owners of the lands on each side. (Added 1985, No. 269 (Adj. Sess.), § 1.)
Amaliksen v. United States, 55 Fed. Cl. 167 (Fed. Cl. 2003). · cites it 2ד19 V.S.A. section 775 (2002). See also Dessu-reau v.”
Demarest v. Town of Underhill, 87 A.3d 439 (Vt. 2013). “19 V.S.A. § 775. We have addressed the arguments as framed.”
In Re Doolittle Mountain Lots, Inc., 2007 VT 104 (Vt. 2007). “Thus, if the effect of the road discontinuance has been to restore the property under the road to the ownership of the adjoining lands, petitioner seeks to have a utility line run over those lands without proper condemnation and compensation.”
Demarest & Moulton v. Town of Underhill, 195 Vt. 204 (Vt. 2013). “[2] The superior court subsequently denied the Town’s motion for summary judgment in the maintenance case and instructed the County Road Commissioners to prepare a report pursuant to 19 V.”
Amaliksen v. United States, 53 Fed. Cl. 63 (Fed. Cl. 2002). · cites it 2ד19 V.S.A. section 775 (2002). See also Dessureau v.”
In re Doolittle Mountain Lots, Inc., 938 A.2d 1230 (Vt. 2007). “Thus, if the effect of the road discontinuance has been to restore the property under the road to the ownership of the adjoining lands, petitioner seeks to have a utility line run over those lands without proper condemnation and compensation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.