Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 20 Chapter 113
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 1933 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 004 : STATE DNA DATABASE AND STATE DATA BANK

(Cite as: 20 V.S.A. § 1933)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2021 · leading case: State v. Medina, 2014 VT 69 (Vt. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Medina, 2014 VT 69 (Vt. 2014). · cites it 10× “We strike down the amendment to 20 V.S.A. § 1933 as unconstitutional solely under Vermont Constitution Chapter I, Article 11.”
State v. Martin, 2008 VT 53 (Vt. 2008). · cites it 2× “20 V.S.A. § 1933 (Cum. Supp. 2007). At issue in these appeals is the application of the amended statute to nonviolent felons, who would not have been subject to sampling under the 1998 enactment.”
People v. Garvin, 812 N.E.2d 773 (Ill. App. Ct. 2004). “93); Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 1933 (2002); Va.”
State v. Wigg, 2007 VT 48 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 2× “[1] On appeal, defendant does not claim any error in the proceedings that led to the sampling order, but instead challenges the proceedings that led to his conviction for the underlying crime.”
State v. Ritter, 2008 VT 72 (Vt. 2008). · cites it 2× “See 20 V.S.A. §§ 1933(a)(1), 1932(12)(I). For the reasons stated in Martin , the compulsory DNA sampling of persons convicted of a violent crime, as defined in 20 V.”
State v. Joseph Leland Bruyette, 2021 VT 43 (Vt. 2021). · cites it 8× “The statute provides, in relevant part: A person required to submit a DNA sample who is serving a sentence in a correctional facility shall have his or her DNA samples collected or taken at the receiving correctional facility, or at a place and time designated by the…”
State v. Wigg, 2007 VT 48 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 2× “Defendant Donald Wigg appeals a district court order mandating that he comply with 20 V.S.A. § 1933 (2000), which requires that all persons convicted of enumerated violent crimes submit a DNA sample to the State for testing and inclusion in the state and federal DNA databases.”
Bruyette v. Menard (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). · cites it 3× “Bruyette pursuant to 20 V.S.A. § 1933 (mandatory samples for Vermont DNA database purposes).”
State v. Martin (Vt. 2008). “20 V.S.A. § 1933 (Cum. Supp. 2007). At issue in these appeals is the application of the amended statute to nonviolent felons, who would not have been subject to sampling under the 1998 enactment.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 1933(a) — 1 case
Bruyette v. Menard (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). “Bruyette pursuant to 20 V.S.A. § 1933 (mandatory samples for Vermont DNA database purposes).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 1933(a)(1) — 3 cases
State v. Ritter, 2008 VT 72 (Vt. 2008). “See 20 V.S.A. §§ 1933(a)(1), 1932(12)(I). For the reasons stated in Martin , the compulsory DNA sampling of persons convicted of a violent crime, as defined in 20 V.”
State v. Wigg, 2007 VT 48 (Vt. 2007). “[1] On appeal, defendant does not claim any error in the proceedings that led to the sampling order, but instead challenges the proceedings that led to his conviction for the underlying crime.”
State v. Wigg, 2007 VT 48 (Vt. 2007). “Defendant Donald Wigg appeals a district court order mandating that he comply with 20 V.S.A. § 1933 (2000), which requires that all persons convicted of enumerated violent crimes submit a DNA sample to the State for testing and inclusion in the state and federal DNA databases.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 1933(a)(2) — 1 case
State v. Medina, 2014 VT 69 (Vt. 2014). “We strike down the amendment to 20 V.S.A. § 1933 as unconstitutional solely under Vermont Constitution Chapter I, Article 11.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 1933(a)(2)(A) — 1 case
State v. Joseph Leland Bruyette, 2021 VT 43 (Vt. 2021). “The statute provides, in relevant part: A person required to submit a DNA sample who is serving a sentence in a correctional facility shall have his or her DNA samples collected or taken at the receiving correctional facility, or at a place and time designated by the…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 20, § 1933(b) — 2 cases
State v. Joseph Leland Bruyette, 2021 VT 43 (Vt. 2021). “The statute provides, in relevant part: A person required to submit a DNA sample who is serving a sentence in a correctional facility shall have his or her DNA samples collected or taken at the receiving correctional facility, or at a place and time designated by the…”
Bruyette v. Menard (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). “Bruyette pursuant to 20 V.S.A. § 1933 (mandatory samples for Vermont DNA database purposes).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.