Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL BENEFITS

(Cite as: 21 V.S.A. § 1344)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 153 cases (15 in the last 5 years), 1961–2026 · leading case: Littlefield v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 487 A.2d 507 (Vt. 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Littlefield v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 487 A.2d 507 (Vt. 1984). · cites it 13× “21 V.S.A. § 1344 (c). Claimant contends, first, that the Board erroneously concluded that she left the employment of the Counseling Service of Addison County (CSAC) for health reasons, and, second, that the Board erroneously found CSAC to be her “last employing unit.”
Trapeni v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 455 A.2d 329 (Vt. 1982). · cites it 13× “In a case of first impression we are called upon to construe the labor dispute disqualification provision, 21 V.S.A. § 1344 (a) (4), and the voluntary leave disqualification provision, 21 V.”
Nolan v. Davidson, 357 A.2d 129 (Vt. 1976). · cites it 9× “Therefore, in accord with 21 V.S.A. § 1344(b) (1) each was given a fixed disqualification of between six to twelve weeks after which they would be eligible for benefits.”
Shufelt v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 531 A.2d 894 (Vt. 1987). · cites it 10× “The same logic is equally applicable to 21 V.S.A. § 1344. Where the Legislature meant “good cause” to be attributable to the employer in § 1344(a)(2)(A), it plainly said so; where it did not say so in § 1344(a)(2)(C), it intended no such restriction.”
Bouchard v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 816 A.2d 508 (Vt. 2002). · cites it 3× “Gross misconduct, under 21 V.S.A. § 1344, involves a “substantial disregard of the employer’s interest, either wilful or culpably negligent.”
Nurmi v. Vermont Emp. Sec. Bd., 197 A.2d 483 (Vt. 1963). · cites it 8× “21 V.S.A. § 1344(1) disqualifies a person from the benefits of the act when he has left the employ of his last employing unit "voluntarily without good cause attributable to such employing unit.”
LaRose v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 431 A.2d 1240 (Vt. 1981). · cites it 8× “The appellant challenges a Vermont Employment Security Board decision finding him disqualified for unemployment benefits under 21 V.S.A. § 1344(a) (2) (A). In dealing with this claim, the majority rewrites Anglo-American jurisprudence, informing us that “equity precedes the *516…”
Kelley v. Dep't of Labor, 2014 VT 74 (Vt. 2014). · cites it 4× “until he or she has presented evidence to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that he or she has performed services in employment for a bona fide employer and has had earnings in excess of six times his or her weekly benefit amount if the Commissioner finds that such individual…”
MacEy v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 752 P.2d 372 (Wash. 1988). · cites it 2× “Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344 (a)(2)(B) (1986).”
Skudlarek v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 627 A.2d 340 (Vt. 1993). · cites it 4× “She was denied benefits pursuant to 21 V.S.A. § 1344(a)(2)(A). The Board found that claimant was aware that her work schedule could be changed and had resolved her child care problems; consequently, there was no good cause for her refusal to continue working under the new…”
LaFountain v. Vermont Emp. Sec. Bd., 330 A.2d 468 (Vt. 1974). · cites it 4× “The Claims Examiner of the Department of Employment Security denied the claim, determining that claimant’s unemployment situation came within the labor dispute disqualification provision of the Unemployment Com *44 pensation Law, 21 V.S.A. § 1344(5). LaFountain filed an appeal…”
Davis v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 438 A.2d 375 (Vt. 1981). · cites it 4× “J, This case tests the adequacy of a physician’s medical report to determine the disqualification status of a claimant for unemployment compensation under 21 V.S.A. § 1344(a), when she claims that she left her last employment because of a health condition which precluded the…”
Show all 153 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(1) — 3 cases
Nurmi v. Vermont Emp. Sec. Bd., 197 A.2d 483 (Vt. 1963). “21 V.S.A. § 1344(1) disqualifies a person from the benefits of the act when he has left the employ of his last employing unit "voluntarily without good cause attributable to such employing unit.”
Shufelt v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 531 A.2d 894 (Vt. 1987). “The same logic is equally applicable to 21 V.S.A. § 1344. Where the Legislature meant “good cause” to be attributable to the employer in § 1344(a)(2)(A), it plainly said so; where it did not say so in § 1344(a)(2)(C), it intended no such restriction.”
Schneider v. Vermont Emp. Sec. Bd., 333 A.2d 104 (Vt. 1975).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(2) — 2 cases
In Re Therrien, 325 A.2d 357 (Vt. 1974).
Wheeler v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 421 A.2d 1315 (Vt. 1980).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(3) — 6 cases
Nurmi v. Vermont Emp. Sec. Bd., 197 A.2d 483 (Vt. 1963). “21 V.S.A. § 1344(1) disqualifies a person from the benefits of the act when he has left the employ of his last employing unit "voluntarily without good cause attributable to such employing unit.”
In Re Potvin, 313 A.2d 25 (Vt. 1973).
Willard v. Vermont Unemployment Comp. Comm'n, 173 A.2d 843 (Vt. 1961).
Shufelt v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 531 A.2d 894 (Vt. 1987). “The same logic is equally applicable to 21 V.S.A. § 1344. Where the Legislature meant “good cause” to be attributable to the employer in § 1344(a)(2)(A), it plainly said so; where it did not say so in § 1344(a)(2)(C), it intended no such restriction.”
In Re Prouty, 310 A.2d 12 (Vt. 1973).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(5) — 2 cases
LaFountain v. Vermont Emp. Sec. Bd., 330 A.2d 468 (Vt. 1974). “The Claims Examiner of the Department of Employment Security denied the claim, determining that claimant’s unemployment situation came within the labor dispute disqualification provision of the Unemployment Com *44 pensation Law, 21 V.S.A. § 1344(5). LaFountain filed an appeal…”
In Re Hatch, 290 A.2d 180 (Vt. 1972).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(a) — 48 cases
Trapeni v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 455 A.2d 329 (Vt. 1982). “In a case of first impression we are called upon to construe the labor dispute disqualification provision, 21 V.S.A. § 1344 (a) (4), and the voluntary leave disqualification provision, 21 V.”
Littlefield v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 487 A.2d 507 (Vt. 1984). “21 V.S.A. § 1344 (c). Claimant contends, first, that the Board erroneously concluded that she left the employment of the Counseling Service of Addison County (CSAC) for health reasons, and, second, that the Board erroneously found CSAC to be her “last employing unit.”
Davis v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 438 A.2d 375 (Vt. 1981). “J, This case tests the adequacy of a physician’s medical report to determine the disqualification status of a claimant for unemployment compensation under 21 V.S.A. § 1344(a), when she claims that she left her last employment because of a health condition which precluded the…”
Garcia v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 488 A.2d 762 (Vt. 1985).
Rushlow v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 476 A.2d 139 (Vt. 1984).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(a)(1) — 6 cases
Kuhn v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 357 A.2d 534 (Vt. 1976).
Cross v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 523 A.2d 1247 (Vt. 1987).
Bourn v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 365 A.2d 253 (Vt. 1976).
Romeo v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 556 A.2d 93 (Vt. 1988).
Mohamed v. Fletcher Allen Health Care, 2012 VT 64 (Vt. 2012).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(a)(1)(A) — 13 cases
Favreau v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 557 A.2d 909 (Vt. 1989).
Mazut v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 561 A.2d 1362 (Vt. 1989).
ALLEN-PENTKOWSKI v. Dep't of Labor, 2011 VT 71 (Vt. 2011).
Santwire v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 530 A.2d 571 (Vt. 1987).
LeBarron v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 552 A.2d 396 (Vt. 1988).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(a)(1)(B) — 1 case
Mohamed v. Fletcher Allen Health Care, 2012 VT 64 (Vt. 2012).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(a)(2) — 1 case
City of Burlington v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 530 A.2d 573 (Vt. 1987).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(a)(2)(A) — 48 cases
LaRose v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 431 A.2d 1240 (Vt. 1981). “The appellant challenges a Vermont Employment Security Board decision finding him disqualified for unemployment benefits under 21 V.S.A. § 1344(a) (2) (A). In dealing with this claim, the majority rewrites Anglo-American jurisprudence, informing us that “equity precedes the *516…”
Kelley v. Dep't of Labor, 2014 VT 74 (Vt. 2014). “until he or she has presented evidence to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that he or she has performed services in employment for a bona fide employer and has had earnings in excess of six times his or her weekly benefit amount if the Commissioner finds that such individual…”
Skudlarek v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 627 A.2d 340 (Vt. 1993). “She was denied benefits pursuant to 21 V.S.A. § 1344(a)(2)(A). The Board found that claimant was aware that her work schedule could be changed and had resolved her child care problems; consequently, there was no good cause for her refusal to continue working under the new…”
Lincoln v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 592 A.2d 885 (Vt. 1991).
Holton v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 2005 VT 42 (Vt. 2005).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(a)(2)(A)(iv) — 1 case
Joseph Worrall v. Dep't of Labor (Snowfire Ltd., Emp.), 2022 VT 46 (Vt. 2022).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(a)(2)(B) — 9 cases
Bouchard v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 816 A.2d 508 (Vt. 2002). “Gross misconduct, under 21 V.S.A. § 1344, involves a “substantial disregard of the employer’s interest, either wilful or culpably negligent.”
Windham Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't v. Dep't of Labor, 86 A.3d 410 (Vt. 2013).
Mohamed v. Fletcher Allen Health Care, 2012 VT 64 (Vt. 2012).
Longe v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 380 A.2d 76 (Vt. 1977).
Newton v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 409 A.2d 594 (Vt. 1979).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(a)(2)(C) — 11 cases
Shufelt v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 531 A.2d 894 (Vt. 1987). “The same logic is equally applicable to 21 V.S.A. § 1344. Where the Legislature meant “good cause” to be attributable to the employer in § 1344(a)(2)(A), it plainly said so; where it did not say so in § 1344(a)(2)(C), it intended no such restriction.”
Piper v. Dep't of Labor, 2011 VT 32 (Vt. 2011).
Calabi v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 376 A.2d 349 (Vt. 1977).
Palucci v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 376 A.2d 14 (Vt. 1977).
Martin v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 417 A.2d 932 (Vt. 1980).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(a)(2)(D) — 3 cases
Piper v. Dep't of Labor, 2011 VT 32 (Vt. 2011).
Piper v. Dept. of Labor (Vt. 2011).
Edward Kadunc v. Dept of Labor (East Burke Sch., Emp.) (Vt. 2011).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(a)(2)(E)(i) — 1 case
Pfenning v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 522 A.2d 743 (Vt. 1986).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(a)(2)(E)(ii) — 1 case
Losordo v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 449 A.2d 941 (Vt. 1982).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(a)(3) — 7 cases
Littlefield v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 487 A.2d 507 (Vt. 1984). “21 V.S.A. § 1344 (c). Claimant contends, first, that the Board erroneously concluded that she left the employment of the Counseling Service of Addison County (CSAC) for health reasons, and, second, that the Board erroneously found CSAC to be her “last employing unit.”
Louis F. LaFountain v. Dep't of Labor (Eden Gen. Store, Inc., Emp.), 186 A.3d 613 (Vt. 2018).
Davis v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 438 A.2d 375 (Vt. 1981). “J, This case tests the adequacy of a physician’s medical report to determine the disqualification status of a claimant for unemployment compensation under 21 V.S.A. § 1344(a), when she claims that she left her last employment because of a health condition which precluded the…”
Favreau v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 594 A.2d 440 (Vt. 1991).
Habel v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 507 A.2d 973 (Vt. 1986).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(a)(4) — 3 cases
Trapeni v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 455 A.2d 329 (Vt. 1982). “In a case of first impression we are called upon to construe the labor dispute disqualification provision, 21 V.S.A. § 1344 (a) (4), and the voluntary leave disqualification provision, 21 V.”
Whitcomb v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 520 A.2d 602 (Vt. 1986).
Pfenning v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 522 A.2d 743 (Vt. 1986).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(a)(5)(B) — 1 case
Griffith v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 376 A.2d 758 (Vt. 1977).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(b) — 3 cases
Nolan v. Davidson, 357 A.2d 129 (Vt. 1976). “Therefore, in accord with 21 V.S.A. § 1344(b) (1) each was given a fixed disqualification of between six to twelve weeks after which they would be eligible for benefits.”
Lane v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 347 A.2d 454 (Vt. 1975).
Marsh v. Vermont Dep't of Emp. Sec., 340 A.2d 93 (Vt. 1975).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(b)(1) — 1 case
Nolan v. Davidson, 357 A.2d 129 (Vt. 1976). “Therefore, in accord with 21 V.S.A. § 1344(b) (1) each was given a fixed disqualification of between six to twelve weeks after which they would be eligible for benefits.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1344(c) — 2 cases
Littlefield v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 487 A.2d 507 (Vt. 1984). “21 V.S.A. § 1344 (c). Claimant contends, first, that the Board erroneously concluded that she left the employment of the Counseling Service of Addison County (CSAC) for health reasons, and, second, that the Board erroneously found CSAC to be her “last employing unit.”
Habel v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 507 A.2d 973 (Vt. 1986).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.