Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 21 Chapter 17
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1349 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL BENEFITS

(Cite as: 21 V.S.A. § 1349)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1970–2026 · leading case: Holton v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 2005 VT 42 (Vt. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Holton v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 2005 VT 42 (Vt. 2005). · cites it 2× “See 21 V.S.A. § 1349 (describing the Board’s appellate jurisdiction).”
Allen v. Vermont Emp. Sec. Bd., 333 A.2d 122 (Vt. 1975). · cites it 3× “” *168 As to the Newville case, 21 V.S.A. § 1349 provides that “ [w] ithin six days after notice of the decision of the referee is given, an interested party may appeal from the decision to the board .”
In Re Wheelock, 287 A.2d 569 (Vt. 1972). · cites it 3× “At that hearing the board allowed the plaintiff to put in what new evidence he chose, as authorized by 21 V.S.A. § 1349. The board also had before it the transcript of the evidence taken by the referee.”
Louis F. LaFountain v. Dep't of Labor (Eden Gen. Store, Inc., Emp.), 186 A.3d 613 (Vt. 2018). “See 21 V.S.A. § 1349 (empowering Board to direct that additional evidence be taken).”
Perry v. Dep't of Emp. & Training, 523 A.2d 1242 (Vt. 1987). · cites it 2× “Claimant’s attorney did not learn of the decision until June 3, long after the six-day appeal period dictated by 21 V.S.A. § 1349 had run. Nevertheless, claimant’s attorney filed an appeal with the Board.”
Wheeler v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 421 A.2d 1315 (Vt. 1980). · cites it 2× “*71 The employer claims first that the findings and evidence do not support the Board’s conclusions and second that the Board failed to make proper findings of fact and conclusions thereon and did not provide appellant with proper notice of its findings, conclusions, ruling of…”
In Re Moore, 269 A.2d 853 (Vt. 1970). · cites it 2× “It is provided by 21 V.S.A. § 1349 that the decision of the Security Board is final “unless an appeal is taken as provided in section 2382 of Title 12.”
Kaufman v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 385 A.2d 1080 (Vt. 1978). “Appellant here contends that the board’s decision changing the characterization of her termination from discharge for misconduct to voluntary quit was a deprivation of due process as guaranteed by the Constitutions of Vermont and the United States.”
Longe v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 380 A.2d 76 (Vt. 1977). “On further appeal, the Employment Security Board also affirmed the disqualification, but upon the different ground that claimant had stated falsely to his employer that he had called upon a particular customer, when in fact he had not.”
Piper v. Dep't of Labor, 2011 VT 32 (Vt. 2011). “The governing statute allows the Board to decide the appeal “solely on the basis of evidence in the record transferred to it by the [ALJ], or upon the basis of evidence in the record and such additional evidence as it may direct to be taken.”
Frye v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 353 A.2d 339 (Vt. 1976). “21 V.S.A. § 1349, as amended, in its pertinent portions, reads as follows: The appeal shall be heard .”
Hunt v. Dep't of Emp. Sec., 458 A.2d 1124 (Vt. 1983). “He filed an appeal on February 26, 1981, explaining that he had filed late because he had lost faith that he would succeed.”
Show all 19 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1349(a) — 1 case
Lisa Tilley v. Dep't of Labor (Vt. 2026).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.