Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1501 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 21 V.S.A. § 1501)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1980–1994 · leading case: Bd. of Trs. of Kellogg-Hubbard Library, Inc. v. Labor Relations Bd. & Local 1369, 649 A.2d 784 (Vt. 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bd. of Trs. of Kellogg-Hubbard Library, Inc. v. Labor Relations Bd. & Local 1369, 649 A.2d 784 (Vt. 1994). · cites it 2× “§ 901; 21 V.S.A. § 1501(b); 21 V.S.A. § 1721. In furtherance of these goals, all three statutes require employers, employees, and unions to follow a similar procedural system administered by a single administrative agency, which determines appropriate bargaining units, conducts…”
Kelley v. Day Care Ctr., Inc., 451 A.2d 1106 (Vt. 1982). · cites it 2× “21 V.S.A. § 1501(b). It is thus clear that the Vermont statute was designed to regulate the relationship between employers and employees, rather than merely to promote the well-being of a particular segment of the economy.”
Vermont State Colleges Fac. Fed'n v. Vermont State Colleges, 418 A.2d 34 (Vt. 1980). “In enacting the State Labor Relations Act the Legislature adopted verbatim the language of 29 U.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1501(b) — 2 cases
Bd. of Trs. of Kellogg-Hubbard Library, Inc. v. Labor Relations Bd. & Local 1369, 649 A.2d 784 (Vt. 1994). “§ 901; 21 V.S.A. § 1501(b); 21 V.S.A. § 1721. In furtherance of these goals, all three statutes require employers, employees, and unions to follow a similar procedural system administered by a single administrative agency, which determines appropriate bargaining units, conducts…”
Kelley v. Day Care Ctr., Inc., 451 A.2d 1106 (Vt. 1982). “21 V.S.A. § 1501(b). It is thus clear that the Vermont statute was designed to regulate the relationship between employers and employees, rather than merely to promote the well-being of a particular segment of the economy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.