(a) This chapter shall be known as the State Labor Relations Act.
(b) It is the purpose and policy of this chapter to prescribe the legitimate rights of
both employees and employers in their relations with each other, to provide orderly
and peaceful procedures for preventing the interference by either with the legitimate
rights of the other, to protect the rights of individual employees in their relations
with labor organizations, to define and proscribe practices on the part of labor and
management that are harmful to the general welfare, and to protect the rights of the
public in connection with labor disputes. (1967, No. 198, § 1; amended 1969, No. 51, § 1, eff. April 8, 1969.)
Bd. of Trs. of Kellogg-Hubbard Library, Inc. v. Labor Relations Bd. & Local 1369, 649 A.2d 784 (Vt. 1994). · cites it 2ד§ 901; 21 V.S.A. § 1501(b); 21 V.S.A. § 1721. In furtherance of these goals, all three statutes require employers, employees, and unions to follow a similar procedural system administered by a single administrative agency, which determines appropriate bargaining units, conducts…”
Kelley v. Day Care Ctr., Inc., 451 A.2d 1106 (Vt. 1982). · cites it 2ד21 V.S.A. § 1501(b). It is thus clear that the Vermont statute was designed to regulate the relationship between employers and employees, rather than merely to promote the well-being of a particular segment of the economy.”
Bd. of Trs. of Kellogg-Hubbard Library, Inc. v. Labor Relations Bd. & Local 1369, 649 A.2d 784 (Vt. 1994). “§ 901; 21 V.S.A. § 1501(b); 21 V.S.A. § 1721. In furtherance of these goals, all three statutes require employers, employees, and unions to follow a similar procedural system administered by a single administrative agency, which determines appropriate bargaining units, conducts…”
Kelley v. Day Care Ctr., Inc., 451 A.2d 1106 (Vt. 1982). “21 V.S.A. § 1501(b). It is thus clear that the Vermont statute was designed to regulate the relationship between employers and employees, rather than merely to promote the well-being of a particular segment of the economy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.