Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 21 Chapter 22
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1727 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 21 V.S.A. § 1727)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1975–2018 · leading case: Negotiations Comm. of Caledonia Cent. Supervisory Union v. Caledonia Cent. Educ. Assn., 184 A.3d 236 (Vt. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Negotiations Comm. of Caledonia Cent. Supervisory Union v. Caledonia Cent. Educ. Assn., 184 A.3d 236 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 2× “21 V.S.A. § 1727. This is not to say the VLRB may not properly consider the Open Meeting Law in its decision-making process.”
Ohland v. Dubay, 336 A.2d 203 (Vt. 1975). · cites it 3× “Its decision on questions of law is reviewable here by virtue of 21 V.S.A. § 1727 (d). Chief among these is whether the Board erroneously dismissed the complaint in accordance with the preponderance of the evidence standard set forth in 21 V.”
Chittenden South Educ. Ass'n v. Hinesburg Sch. Dist., 514 A.2d 1065 (Vt. 1986). “Under 21 V.S.A. § 1727(d), the VLRB is granted broad authority to remedy unfair labor practices.”
In Re Sw. Vermont Educ. Ass'n, 396 A.2d 123 (Vt. 1978). “Amendment would only be a formality, and one well within the purview of 21 V.S.A. § 1727(a), permitting liberal amendment of complaints by the Board.”
Hinesburg Sch. Dist. v. Vermont NEA, 522 A.2d 222 (Vt. 1986). · cites it 2× “* Upon investigation of the School Board’s charge, the Labor Board exercised its discretion pursuant to 21 V.S.A. § 1727(a) and declined to issue an unfair labor practice complaint.”
Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, Local 300 v. Enosburg Falls Water & Light Dep't, 527 A.2d 1150 (Vt. 1987). · cites it 2× “The limitations period for unfair labor practice charges is contained in 21 V.S.A. § 1727(a), which provides, in relevant part: No complaint shall issue based on any unfair labor practice occurring more than six months prior to the filing of the charge .”
CHITTENDEN SO. EDUC. v. Hinesburg Sch. Dist., 514 A.2d 1065 (Vt. 1986). “Finally, the School Board contends that the VLRB abused its discretion in ordering the School Board to reinstate striking teachers upon their unconditional offer to work.”
Dube v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Warehousemen, Local No. 597, 430 A.2d 440 (Vt. 1981). “The union points out in its brief that, since grievances under the contract involved here are arbitrable, 21 V.S.A. § 1727(f) might well, as a policy matter, bar an award of back pay here by the Board in any event.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1727(a) — 4 cases
Negotiations Comm. of Caledonia Cent. Supervisory Union v. Caledonia Cent. Educ. Assn., 184 A.3d 236 (Vt. 2018). “21 V.S.A. § 1727. This is not to say the VLRB may not properly consider the Open Meeting Law in its decision-making process.”
In Re Sw. Vermont Educ. Ass'n, 396 A.2d 123 (Vt. 1978). “Amendment would only be a formality, and one well within the purview of 21 V.S.A. § 1727(a), permitting liberal amendment of complaints by the Board.”
Hinesburg Sch. Dist. v. Vermont NEA, 522 A.2d 222 (Vt. 1986). “* Upon investigation of the School Board’s charge, the Labor Board exercised its discretion pursuant to 21 V.S.A. § 1727(a) and declined to issue an unfair labor practice complaint.”
Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, Local 300 v. Enosburg Falls Water & Light Dep't, 527 A.2d 1150 (Vt. 1987). “The limitations period for unfair labor practice charges is contained in 21 V.S.A. § 1727(a), which provides, in relevant part: No complaint shall issue based on any unfair labor practice occurring more than six months prior to the filing of the charge .”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1727(d) — 3 cases
Ohland v. Dubay, 336 A.2d 203 (Vt. 1975). “Its decision on questions of law is reviewable here by virtue of 21 V.S.A. § 1727 (d). Chief among these is whether the Board erroneously dismissed the complaint in accordance with the preponderance of the evidence standard set forth in 21 V.”
Chittenden South Educ. Ass'n v. Hinesburg Sch. Dist., 514 A.2d 1065 (Vt. 1986). “Under 21 V.S.A. § 1727(d), the VLRB is granted broad authority to remedy unfair labor practices.”
CHITTENDEN SO. EDUC. v. Hinesburg Sch. Dist., 514 A.2d 1065 (Vt. 1986). “Finally, the School Board contends that the VLRB abused its discretion in ordering the School Board to reinstate striking teachers upon their unconditional offer to work.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 1727(f) — 1 case
Dube v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Warehousemen, Local No. 597, 430 A.2d 440 (Vt. 1981). “The union points out in its brief that, since grievances under the contract involved here are arbitrable, 21 V.S.A. § 1727(f) might well, as a policy matter, bar an award of back pay here by the Board in any event.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.