Montgomery v. Brinver Corp., 457 A.2d 644 (Vt. 1983). · cites it 4דDefendant claims that, pursuant to 21 V.S.A. § 643, disability payments shall not continue beyond 330 weeks.”
Butler v. Huttig Bldg. Prods., 2003 VT 48 (Vt. 2003). “In cases of fraud, the Act vests discretion in the Commissioner to require forfeiture of “all or a portion” of workers’ compensation benefits. Id. The obvious intent of § 708(a) is to deter and sanction false claims for compensation, and to relieve employers from having to pay…”
Orvis v. Hutchins, 179 A.2d 470 (Vt. 1962). · cites it 2ד" 21 V.S.A. § 643. Period of payments "Payments shall not continue after such disability ends, nor longer than three hundred annd thirty weeks.”
Fleury v. Kessel/Duff Constr. Co., 533 A.2d 1197 (Vt. 1987). “122, § 7) (the total amount payable in compensation on account of an accident to one person resulting in permanent total disability shall not exceed the limit of compensation); 21 V.S.A. § 643 (as amended by 1955, No. 227, § 3) (payments of temporary total disability benefits…”
Valente v. Howe Richardson Scale Co., 248 A.2d 735 (Vt. 1968). “But 21 V.S.A. §643, also referred to in §648, does shed some light on the question presented: “Payments shall not continue after such disability ends, nor longer than three hundred and thirty weeks.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.