Upon the Commissioner’s own motion or upon the application of any party in interest
upon the ground of a change in the conditions, or whenever doubts have arisen as to
the jurisdiction of the Commissioner at the time the petition was presented, the Commissioner
may at any time within six years of the date of award review any award by giving at
least six days’ notice thereof to the parties personally, or to the attorneys appearing
in the cause. On such review, the Commissioner may make an order ending, diminishing,
or increasing the compensation previously awarded, subject to the maximum or minimum
provided in this chapter. If it appears that the petition for hearing was presented
without previous authority or that for other reason the Commissioner did not have
jurisdiction in the cause, the Commissioner may make an order striking off the award,
and shall state conclusions of fact and rulings of law and immediately send to the
parties a copy of the award. Such a review shall not affect any money already paid. (Amended 1993, No. 225 (Adj. Sess.), § 13.)
Carter v. Fred's Plumbing & Heating, Inc., 816 A.2d 490 (Vt. 2002). “; 21 V.S.A. § 668 (Cum. Supp. 2002). Turning to plaintiff’s substantive claims, plaintiff makes three arguments.”
Quinn v. Pate, 197 A.2d 795 (Vt. 1964). “Under 21 V.S.A. §668 the appellant sought a review of the award made under the agreed statement of facts, by the Commissioner of Industrial Relations.”
Lydia Diamond v. Burlington Free Press, 178 A.3d 335 (Vt. 2017). · cites it 3דThe Commissioner concluded that claimant was seeking to modify an award of PPD benefits that had been approved in 2004 and thus her claim was barred by 21 V.S.A. § 668, which states that an approved award may only be modified within six years of the date of the award.”
Catherine Heller v. Bast & Rood Architechts (Vt. 2014). “” 21 V.S.A. § 668. She explained that because permanent partial disability benefits are not due until an injured worker “is as far restored as the permanent character of [the] injuries will permit,” generally an injured claimant is not expected to become more disabled after…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.