Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 1032 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 003 : USE OF ROADWAY

(Cite as: 23 V.S.A. § 1032)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1971–1971 · leading case: Elva Storke (Aka Stork) by Her Legal Guardian Loretta Storke Martin v. St. Johnsbury Trucking Co., Inc., 443 F.2d 89 (2d Cir. 1971).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Elva Storke (Aka Stork) by Her Legal Guardian Loretta Storke Martin v. St. Johnsbury Trucking Co., Inc., 443 F.2d 89 (2d Cir. 1971). “§ 1035) and oncoming traffic situations (23 V.S.A. § 1032). It is clear that § 1039, as an additional statute dealing with slow-moving vehicles only, is helpful in the passing situation, since slow moving traffic in that context presents special problems, but not in the oncoming…”
Larmay v. VanEtten, 278 A.2d 736 (1971). “§ 1032, it is provided: “Operators of vehicles proceeding in opposite directions shall exercise due care and shall each keep to the right of the center of the highway so as to pass without interference.” Other applicable rules of the road are found in 23 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.