Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 2295 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 011 : MISCELLANEOUS REGULATORY POWERS

(Cite as: 24 V.S.A. § 2295)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2003–2012 · leading case: Hunters, Anglers & Trappers Ass'n of Vermont, Inc. v. Winooski Valley Park Dist., 913 A.2d 391 (Vt. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Hunters, Anglers & Trappers Ass'n of Vermont, Inc. v. Winooski Valley Park Dist., 913 A.2d 391 (Vt. 2006). · cites it 10× “The complaint alleged that the District’s ban on hunting, trapping, and firearm possession violated both the Vermont Constitution’s protection of the right to hunt and 24 V.S.A. § 2295, which prohibits municipalities from directly regulating hunting or trapping.”
City of Montpelier v. Barnett, Sanborn & Nat. Resources Bd., 2012 VT 32 (Vt. 2012). · cites it 4× “In Hunters, Anglers & Trappers Ass’n of Vermont this Court held that a municipality that owned land could post it against hunting under § 5201(a) despite the prohibition of 24 V.S.A. § 2295. 2006 VT 82 , ¶¶ 9-13. That holding does not control here.”
Hunters, Anglers & Trappers Assoc. of VT v. Winooski Valley Park Dist., 181 Vt. 12 (Vt. 2006). · cites it 7× “The complaint alleged that the District's ban on hunting, trapping, and firearm possession violated both the Vermont Constitution's protection of the right to hunt and 24 V.S.A. § 2295, which prohibits municipalities from directly regulating hunting or trapping.”
Vt. Hunters, Anglers v. Winooski Valley Park Dist. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2003). “” 24 V.S.A. § 2295. The question here posed is whether that prohibition bars defendant Park District from prohibiting hunting on its lands.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.