§ 309. Bonds of deputies; liability of sheriff; deputy’s powers and duties
A sheriff shall be liable for the official acts and neglects of his or her deputies,
and may take bonds of indemnity from them. Such deputies may, and when required, shall
perform any official duty which may be required of the sheriff. Returns of their acts
and doings shall be signed by them as deputy sheriffs, and their official acts shall
be deemed to be the acts of the sheriff.
Doe v. Forrest, 2004 VT 37 (Vt. 2004). · cites it 7דWe hold that, on the record evidence, the trial court correctly ruled that defendants are not directly liable for Forrest’s misconduct under 24 V.S.A. § 309, and that summary judgment for defendants was proper on two of plaintiff’s theories of vicarious liability.”
Huminski v. Corsones, 386 F.3d 116 (2d Cir. 2004). “According to Vermont law, the court officer for sessions of a state district court held in a territorial unit shall be a sheriff of any county in that unit, a constable, or an indifferent person, when necessary.”
Huminski v. Corsones, 396 F.3d 53 (2d Cir. 2004). “According to Vermont law, the court officer for sessions of a state district court held in a territorial unit shall be a sheriff of any county in that unit, a constable, or an indifferent person, when necessary.”
State v. Oren, 647 A.2d 1009 (Vt. 1994). “Under 24 V.S.A. § 309, “deputies may, and when required, shall perform any official duty which may be required of the sheriff.”
In Re Huard, 212 A.2d 640 (Vt. 1965). “§293 provides that “A sheriff so commissioned and sworn shall serve and execute lawful writs, warrants and processes directed to him. . . ” Under 24 V.S.A. §307 a deputy sheriff is appointed by the sheriff.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.